Boosting Market

Hi Kayla, Thank you for your feedback. We’d like to clarify a few important points to ensure everything is accurate and transparent. Your order was placed at 09:02 AM and a refund was requested just 17 minutes later. As outlined clearly in our Terms of Service and Refund Policy (available both on our homepage and during checkout), cancellations within 24 hours are subject to a 30% retainer fee. This fee exists because, once an order is placed, our system immediately begins allocating resources and reserving a booster slot. Despite this, our support team processed your request promptly and issued the refund to your payment method as quickly as possible. The retained amount you mentioned is simply the application of this policy—not an arbitrary charge. We always strive to remain professional and helpful, regardless of the situation, and we’re sorry if your experience felt otherwise. However, labeling the company as a “scam” is inaccurate and does not reflect the reality of our service, which is built on transparency and trusted by thousands of customers every month. If you have any further questions, we remain available to assist you. Best regards, Support Team

Dear Heinerich, sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. https://imgur.com/a/5H96OuR Your purchase was refunded at the moment of your request. After we hit the "Refund" button, the processing time is handled by PayPal, and we are not involved anymore in the process. If you have any further questions, we remain available to assist you. Best regards, Support Team

Hi, Thank you for your feedback — we completely understand your frustration and appreciate you taking the time to share your experience. Unfortunately, the current situation in Iran — where a large portion of Rainbow Six Siege boosters are based — is impacting availability more than usual. This has temporarily affected assignment times across the board. Additionally, your order includes some very selective options, such as requesting a booster from the top 0.01% of players. While this guarantees a higher-quality experience, it also significantly narrows the pool of available boosters, which can lead to longer assignment times. The “~2 hours” estimate shown on the website reflects the average assignment time under standard conditions and does not account for highly specific requirements or external factors like the current situation. That said, we are actively monitoring your order and doing our best to assign the most suitable booster as soon as possible. We truly appreciate your patience, and we’re confident the final service will meet your expectations. We’ll be happy to revisit your review once the order is completed. Best regards, BoostingMarket Team

Hello Vlad, We’re sorry you feel this way. Booster allocation depends on availability, order details, and queue timing. While many orders are assigned much faster, occasional delays can happen — especially during busy periods. That said, labeling a service as “trash” over a short waiting time doesn’t reflect the full picture of how professional boosting platforms operate. We complete thousands of successful orders and maintain a strong track record with the vast majority of our customers. If something didn’t meet your expectations, our support team is always available to provide clarity and assistance. We remain committed to delivering reliable, secure, and high-quality service to every serious customer. USD 5.99$ from your order have been already refunded to your original payment method. Best -BoostingMarket Team

Thank you for sharing your feedback. We take accusations regarding privacy, compensation, and professionalism extremely seriously. However, the version of events presented in this review is factually incorrect and highly misleading, and for transparency toward future customers, we need to clarify what actually happened. The situation described regarding another customer allegedly adding an account or “contacting without consent” was thoroughly investigated on our end. Here are the verified facts: 1️⃣ Alleged “Privacy Violation” & Account Contact The boosters mentioned (So*** and N****) regularly duo queue together to ensure higher win rates and service quality. • The reviewer uses the hidden name feature in Marvel Rivals, which displays a completely different in-game alias. • The visible in-game name during the boost was not her actual nickname. • Another unrelated customer happened to have a visually identical nickname (including special Greek characters). • Both customers coincidentally placed orders in a similar rank range and were boosted in overlapping sessions. • The boosters were never aware of the reviewer’s real nickname and always identified the account under the hidden alias. It is not possible for the Booster to see the person's original nickname. There was no sharing of personal data, no exposure, and no privacy breach. The assumption that someone “added an alt account” deliberately to her profile is simply not supported by the evidence. We explained this multiple times in detail, but unfortunately, our explanations were dismissed. 2️⃣ Compensation & Pricing We never “ghosted” this customer. All requests were reviewed, and we complied whenever policy conditions were met. We also honored special discounts and private arrangements on several occasions, even when not required, for example on "One Above All" season deals. 3️⃣ Regarding the alleged in-game warning: There is no verified evidence proving that a booster caused a penalty. Game warnings can be triggered by various system-level factors, and correlation does not equal causation. We investigated the timestamp claim internally and found no conclusive wrongdoing. We do not tolerate boosters acting outside professional boundaries. If any verified misconduct occurs, immediate action is taken. In this case, no breach was proven. 4️⃣ Our Position on Privacy & Professionalism Privacy is our #1 operational priority. • Boosters are contractually bound to confidentiality. • We prohibit unauthorized contact outside service scope. • We do not tolerate disrespectful behavior toward our staff. • We also do not tolerate harassment or false public accusations directed at our team members by name. 5️⃣ Breach of ToS and Website Exploit: It is also important to note that this customer previously used a website exploit to obtain a service at a lower price than intended. Despite this, we handled the situation professionally and continued to provide support. There was NO compensation involved, we explained to the customer that we might be able to integrate the current order with a larger one, something that has been deemed not feasible as per our policies, hence discarded as an option. Throughout our interactions, we remained professional and continued to accommodate requests — even when faced with hostility. We have thousands of successfully completed orders and long-term returning clients who trust us because we: • Deliver consistently • Protect account privacy of our customers • Investigate issues thoroughly • Treat customers fairly We regret that this client remains dissatisfied despite extensive explanations and accommodations. However, we stand firmly by our investigation and our internal records. If the customer is willing to engage constructively, we remain open to discussing the matter again via email or contact form — but we cannot accept false narratives that misrepresent our team and processes. — BoostingMarket Team

Hello Alexander We’d like to clarify the situation, as the statements in this review are factually incorrect. Your refund was approved and issued by us on January 18th, only two days after your request on January 16th. Any additional waiting time is entirely due to Google Pay’s processing timelines, which are outside of our control. We will also attach a screenshot confirming that the refund has been successfully processed on our side: https://imgur.com/a/ttDTgvD. I also re-sent the refund invoice to your email. It is also important to note that you have previously placed one order with us, which was completed successfully and without any issues (in august of last year). For this reason, describing our service as a “scam” is not only inaccurate, but also completely out of context. We always process refunds promptly and transparently, and we encourage customers to account for their payment provider’s processing times before drawing conclusions. Should you need any further clarification, our support team remains available and happy to assist. Kind regards, -BoostingMarket Team

Hello jfkwndnnfne, We must firmly reject the accusations made in this review. BoostingMarket does not use, promote, or tolerate cheats, exploits, or any third-party software under any circumstances. All boosters operating on our platform are vetted, contractually bound, and subject to internal monitoring. After reviewing your case, it is clear that the Counter-Strike 2 service referenced was not carried out exclusively through BoostingMarket. You explicitly confirmed that you had purchased similar services from third-party providers prior to using our platform. As such, any sanctions applied to your Steam account cannot be attributed to BoostingMarket or to any booster working within our system. Additionally, our support team clearly explained that in situations involving potential account risk, Duo Queue is the only recommended and secure option, as it ensures transparency and direct player participation. This guidance was provided in advance and was not followed. Regarding support responsiveness, you were answered within our standard timeframes and in accordance with the verifiable facts of the case. We cannot be held responsible for consequences arising from external services, actions taken outside our platform, or providers not affiliated with BoostingMarket. We therefore invite you to refrain from posting misleading or unsubstantiated claims. We remain available to provide clarifications based solely on objective and verifiable information, but we categorically deny any responsibility for events outside our scope. Kind regards, BoostingMarket Support Team