企业入驻搜索写评价分类关于
简体中文English
公共及地方服务

MasterCPE

101 条评价

4.5101 条评价
写评价

关于 MasterCPE

数据更新
网站
mastercpe.com
分类
公共及地方服务
所在地
美国
状态
待认证
近 12 个月
1 条评价
差评回复率
0%(0/8 条)
是 MasterCPE 的所有者? 免费认领此主页,验证后即可回复客户评价。

商家自述

MasterCPE 是个专业团队,专门帮你用最省时省钱的方式搞定 CPE 学分要求。他们努力提供跟你职业相关的最新主题,希望你觉得课程有意思……

MasterCPE靠谱吗?

MasterCPE(mastercpe.com)在 OK.one 的综合评分为 4.5 分(满分 5 分),基于本站收录的 101 条用户评价,属于公共及地方服务分类,口碑优秀。86% 的评价为 4 星及以上,5% 为 1 星;商家尚未回复差评;近 12 个月新增 1 条。数据最后更新于 2026-09-03。

用户怎么说

MasterCPE 必须给五星!

网站好用,导航清晰。课程材料与课程标题相符,根据我的经验,这点并不总能做到。课程内容与时俱进,反映了影响会计实务和准则的当前经济和政治状况(比如新冠疫情)。而且,尽管某些概念很复杂,但课程材料通俗易懂。

期待给你评分

I look forward to giving you my rating. I just completed 62 hours of CPE on Master CPE. As a CPA of 30+ years, with numerous additional licenses and certifications (Certified Valuation Analysis, Registered Investment Adviser, licenses Investment Banker, hold an MBA, and several others) I’ve taken quite a few courses on-line, including several annual memberships on Master CPE. Most of the courses I just took, I’d rate as good to very good. Unfortunately, I also signed up for two courses that were so sub-quality that I will hesitate to purchase Master CPE again. Course M016-0333, Pocket MBA, was probably the most frustrating course I have ever signed up for. After reading the material, I attempted the final exam. The way the questions are phrased, and the answer options presented, made most of the questions extremely difficult to answer, even after going back into the material and re-reading the section it pertained to. The answer could still not be ascertained, and when I tried to research the answer on other sources, still, the answer options often did not coincide. There was very often no clear, correct answer option. After spending several hours reading and attempting he final exam, about 15 hours, I decided to surrender, throw away these hours, and start over on something else. I needed those 15 hours, and I was very, very upset! The exam was almost impossible. What was the author attempting, did he expect me to be an expert on his perspective like someone who just completed 2 years of study with him for those 15 hours? I was disgusted. I also took Financial Essentials for Not for Profit Managers (F018-0321) and was disappointed. The reading materials were very, very poorly organized, then the author scatters the same subjects throughout the text. And why not present a decent index instead of spending maybe 2 minutes developing it? I would rate my other courses all at 4 stars or better. I would rate the Pocket MBA is “unacceptable”, a negative star rating. I would rate the Financial Essentials for Not for Profit Managers as maybe 1 star. Because of these 2 courses, I will hesitant to ever purchase Master CPE ever again.

大家还看了