True Trading Group

Gio, it’s unfortunate and disappointing that you chose to take this route. It was never my intention to make any of this public. However, since you decided to publish misleading statements, half-truths, and a manipulated narrative to justify your actions, I’m going to respond clearly and with receipts. You titled this “Transparency Matters.” I agree. That’s why context matters. “Straightforward account” This is not. It’s selective and omits key facts and timelines. “34 years of professional trading experience, including market making…” Up until now, we had no reason to question you. Everything you represented appeared to check out, and it still may. We are not accusing you of anything. Also, you were not acting in a licensed capacity on behalf of TTG or providing individualized financial advice as a registered professional. You were a contracted contributor providing general education and market commentary. Because you made this public and centered your background as a core credibility point, we verified what we could through publicly available regulatory sources as of January 14, 2026, including FINRA BrokerCheck, SEC IAPD, and NFA BASIC. The result was no match found for Christian C. Giordano using the search terms documented in the report. A “no match” does not automatically imply wrongdoing. If you want the public to rely on that claim, provide verifiable identifiers (CRD number, firm name(s), dates) and we will update the record. “I contributed real value…” For a period of time, true. You contributed and were reliable. What you leave out is that over the last 18 to 24 months, the consistency and fulfillment of contracted responsibilities was not what it needed to be. Compensation and payments Your comments implying improper compensation are false. You were compensated in full as agreed. We have complete receipts and written confirmations. We are not publishing private payment records publicly, but we will provide them to the appropriate parties if needed. Examples from the written record include you confirming receipt: May 9, 2025: “you got the 3500?” → “JUST NOW SAW IT YES ty” May 12, 2025: “sent” → “Got it ty” Sep 29, 2025: follow up → payment sent → “Thank you! 🙏” Following up is normal. Suggesting bad faith is not accurate and is, in our view, defamatory. “Shifting responsibilities without communication” Not true. Changes were communicated and acknowledged by you. Example: Sep 18 to 19, 2025, PTMAP room reintegration was communicated, and you responded: “Ofc I’m on board… whatever is needed.” “Questioning decisions was discouraged” Also not true. The issue was professionalism, tone, timing, and alignment in a paid community. Example: Sep 24, 2025, you were asked to be hyper aware of tone and reinforce what we were doing. “Contract terminated abruptly” This was not about you “questioning decisions.” It was about an extended period where the work performed did not match what you were contracted to do. “I’ve moved on to build my own platform” You signed a Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement dated 3/5/2021 with ongoing confidentiality obligations and restrictions. That agreement speaks for itself. No drama, just facts. If you want the public to rely on your claims, provide verifiable details. If you want to resolve this privately and professionally, that door is open.

Robert, I think you are confused brother... This is a review site for businesses, not "corporate fan fiction" for bored, abusive, entitled & miserable human beings, which you clearly are. We drafted several professional responses to this, but since there is NOTHING professional about any of this as it deals in made up stories, false alegations and utter nonsense, this response was the only one that made sense. Happy New Year!