企业入驻搜索写评价分类关于
简体中文English
公共及地方服务

University of the People

101 条评价

3.9101 条评价
写评价

关于 University of the People

数据更新
网站
uopeople.edu
分类
公共及地方服务
所在地
United States · Pasadena
状态
待认证
近 12 个月
101 条评价
差评回复率
96%(24/25 条)
是 University of the People 的所有者? 免费认领此主页,验证后即可回复客户评价。

University of the People靠谱吗?

University of the People(uopeople.edu)在 OK.one 的综合评分为 3.9 分(满分 5 分),基于本站收录的 101 条用户评价,属于公共及地方服务分类,口碑一般。24% 的评价为 1 星,差评比例偏高;商家回复了 96% 的差评。数据最后更新于 2026-08-10。

用户怎么说

W
Wendy Bradford · 写过 2 条评价 · 体验于 2026-06-08 ·

完美的教育机会

完美的教育机会 我正在继续我在当地社区大学开始的学业。注册和转学过程非常精简且容易。这些课程很容易遵循,我可以实时看到我所取得的进步。这让我充满动力。

M
Manus · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-05-01 ·

我是 UoPeople 的学生

我是 UoPeople 的学生。我注意到您正在积极回复该网站上的评论,而许多注册学生仍在等待对其紧急询问的答复,尤其是在新学期即将开始的情况下。在这个关键时刻,您能优先考虑对学生的支持吗?

University of the People 回复2026-06-09

As a non-profit, tuition-free online university, UoPeople operates with limited resources while supporting a global student community. We understand that response times can be frustrating, particularly as a new term approaches, and we appreciate your patience. Our team works hard to respond to both student inquiries and public reviews, and we are doing our best to address every request as quickly as possible. If you are experiencing an urgent issue, please contact us directly at [email protected] with specific details so we can address your concerns and work towards a resolution. Thank you.

M
Madie Schmidt · 写过 5 条评价 · 体验于 2026-05-23 ·

大学教职员不存在

大学工作人员只是训练有素的人工智能。我上了三个学期,不断地要求他们确认发送我的成绩单的地址,要么没有回复,要么回复告诉我当我必须邮寄成绩单时将其上传到网站上。教授和管理人员都使用人工智能来完成他们的工作,而学生却被禁止使用它。除了极快的速度和没有帮助之外,别指望有什么。 *大学回复后的更新* 他们告诉我发送消息的电子邮件不受监控,因为我有几个请求从未得到回复。如果员工不是人工智能,他们就会使用人工智能浏览电子邮件而不回答任何问题。 在不断尝试达成任何形式的解决方案但没有得到任何愿意提供任何帮助的回应后,我从大学退学了。 确认成绩单发送地点的时间不应超过 6 个月*,因为地址从未得到确认。 进一步回应他们的编辑。我向招生、信息和付款发送了一系列六封电子邮件,但从未得到回复。 “24小时内”的回复完全无视我的要求,也没有回答简单的问题。如果信任试点允许使用图像,我会上传他们从未回复的电子邮件的屏幕截图。这所大学是公开的。

University of the People 回复2026-05-29

We are sorry to hear that your experience has been frustrating, Madie. Our staff, advisors, and instructors are real people working to support students from around the world, and we understand how disappointing it can feel when communication does not meet expectations. We also understand your concerns regarding transcript submission guidance and response times, please email us directly at [email protected] with more specific details regarding your transcript situation so we can review your concerns further and work toward a resolution. Thank you. EDIT: While we understand your frustration, Madie, our records show that our team responded to your inquiries within 24 hours. As a non-profit institution serving students worldwide, we work hard to provide timely support while maintaining an accessible and affordable education model. If you have any further concerns, please contact us at [email protected] with more specific details so we can address your concerns and work towards a resolution. Thank you.

d
donesixfour · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-05-21 ·

经济实惠、灵活且能够改变上班族生活的产品

我在人民大学的经历非常积极。作为一名平衡教学、辅导、音乐指导和研究生学习的在职专业人士,UoPeople 为我提供了灵活性,让我可以在不承担巨额学生债务的情况下完成健康科学学士学位。异步格式使我能够按照自己的日程安排进行学习,同时仍然保持学术严谨性。 我特别欣赏学生群体的多样性以及与来自世界各地的人们合作的机会。该课程挑战我成为一名更强大的作家、研究员和批判性思考者,并为我接受研究生教育和职业机会做好了充分的准备。大学的负担能力和入学机会使那些可能永远没有机会获得学位的人能够接受高等教育。 UoPeople 获得 WASC 认证,并继续在全球范围内扩大其认可度和合作伙伴关系。 与任何在线大学一样,它需要很强的自律和独立学习能力。与顾问和管理人员的沟通有时可能会很慢,我相信提高响应能力将显着增强学生的体验。然而,总的来说,与成本相比,教育的价值是非常高的,我很自豪能成为 UoPeople 的毕业生。

K
Kat · 写过 2 条评价 · 体验于 2026-05-15 ·

各个层面上都是可耻的机构

这所大学纯粹是肮脏的。当顾问做出回应时,他们缺席且无济于事。这些课程充满了教授和同行评审的人工智能废话。有些教授还可以。但大多数人都是种族主义者、自负狂。这里没有一致性。有些教授会给你很高的成绩,并吹捧你的写作技巧和对 APA 风格的坚持。其他人会找到理由给你平庸的成绩。只是因为他们可以。顾问不会为您提供任何帮助。由于上述所有原因,我最终不得不放弃我的计划。我不能再成为这个可耻机构的一部分了。这是不值得的。我不向任何人推荐这所大学。我将在其他地方寻求研究生学位。

University of the People 回复2026-05-19

We are sorry to hear that your experience did not meet your expectations, Kat. We take concerns regarding faculty conduct, grading consistency, academic quality, and student support very seriously. Allegations of discrimination or unprofessional conduct are especially concerning to us and are not reflective of the standards we strive to uphold. As a non-profit American accredited university accredited by WASC, we are committed to upholding the same academic and integrity standards expected across higher education, including maintaining strong academic integrity and addressing the growing challenges surrounding AI misuse in online learning environments. We're sorry to hear you chose to leave the program. If you would be willing to share more details regarding your experience, please contact us directly at [email protected] so we can better address your concerns and work toward a resolution.

S
Serenity Sprankle · 写过 2 条评价 · 体验于 2026-05-11 ·

改变生活且灵活

人民大学给我带来了一个全新的世界。我将能够获得一个学位,如果没有人民大学,我就不可能获得灵活性。

University of the People 回复2026-05-19

Thank you for your kind words!

T
Tre · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-05-10 ·

停止将人工智能强加给我们

仅提供 Roselyn ai 作为替代方案。并非每个人都拥有符合规格的设备或稳定的互联网可供使用。此外,并不是每个人都希望被迫使用人工智能。这通常是错误且不道德的。

University of the People 回复2026-05-16

Please know our mission remains unchanged: to make high-quality, affordable education accessible to students everywhere. Students who face unique circumstances that make Rosalyn difficult to use, including technology, connectivity, privacy, or accessibility concerns, will be able to continue using a different proctoring process. For additional guidance on this option, please reach out to your personal advisor.

B
Brendon Wash · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-05-07 ·

掠食性诱饵和开关

掠食性诱饵和开关。甚至无法登录,无论您如何回复或发送内容到哪个电子邮件(例如他们在此处回复的复制粘贴信息电子邮件),都没有人回复您。这个地方是一个骗局。不过,他们会立即收取您的付款。没有道德,没有质量,还有掠夺性的申请费。

University of the People 回复2026-05-08

We’re sorry to hear you feel this way, Brendon. All information regarding our fee structure is openly available on our website, including our tuition-free structure which is available here: https://www.uopeople.edu/tuition-free/what-is-tuition-free/ As a non-profit institution, we have devoted our resources to lowering the costs of education, that said, we ask for minimal processing fees to help keep our university sustainable. We have contacted our team regarding your concerns, and you will be hearing back from us within two business days. If you have any questions in the meantime, please email us directly at [email protected].

A
Allen · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-05-05 ·

UoPeople 在线 MBA

人民大学的在线 MBA 课程的要求比许多人想象的要高得多。虽然它提供了灵活性,但这并不是一种轻松或被动的体验。成功需要持续的参与、强有力的时间管理以及遵守每周阅读、讨论帖子、同伴回应和书面作业的纪律。这种结构促使你积极参与,而不是简单地吸收信息。 该计划特别有价值的是互动程度。课程在很大程度上依赖于基于讨论的学习,学生需要贡献深思熟虑的见解并对同伴做出有意义的回应。这创造了一个学习超越教科书并成为共享体验的环境。您不断面临捍卫自己的想法、考虑替代观点并以实际方式应用概念的挑战。 另一个突出的方面是学生群体的多样性。学习者来自广泛的文化和经济背景,这将每一次讨论变成了全球思想交流。这种“熔炉”动态让您接触到现实世界的商业观点,而这是您在传统课堂上通常不会遇到的。 总体而言,该计划需要付出努力,但正是这种严谨使得它值得。它不仅培养知识,还培养适应能力和全球意识。

University of the People 回复2026-05-05

Thank you for your kind words!

L
LeeAnn · 写过 6 条评价 · 体验于 2026-04-29 ·

经济实惠、灵活且免费的教科书!

在 40 多岁的时候兼顾两份工作、孩子和计算机科学学位听起来很疯狂,但 UoPeople 的灵活性是无价的!我可以躺在床上读书,因为所有书籍和资源都是免费的。它的价格非常实惠,奖学金过程非常简单,而且支持也很棒。强烈推荐! ✨

University of the People 回复2026-05-05

Thank you for your kind words!

I
Izak van der Merwe · 写过 8 条评价 · 体验于 2026-04-29 ·

的概念和承受能力……

UoPeople 的理念和负担能力吸引了我,在这方面他们并没有让我失望,因为我从第一天起就得到了支持。 通过导师和其他部门的沟通可以做出一些改进,并且一些平台增强功能可以使导航变得更容易。

University of the People 回复2026-05-05

Thank you for your kind words!

c
customer · 写过 2 条评价 · 体验于 2026-04-22 ·

我支付了课程费用,然后……

我支付了课程费用,但几个小时后,由于沟通不畅,我决定退出课程。已给予部分退款,即使在查询后,迄今为止也只有 0 次沟通 我确实向该电子邮件发送了邮件,但仍然没有解决

University of the People 回复2026-05-05

We’re sorry to hear that your experience did not meet expectations. Please email us directly at [email protected] with more specific details so we can address your concerns and work towards a resolution. Thank you.

T
Thor Kidmose · 写过 10 条评价 · 体验于 2026-04-23 ·

不能推荐

不能推荐。希望他们停止发送电子邮件。希望我没有给他们钱。但我们在这里,只需选择其他东西即可。

University of the People 回复2026-04-29

We’re sorry to hear that your experience didn’t meet your expectations, Thor. We’ll make sure you’re removed from our mailing list right away. If you have any additional concerns, please reach out to us directly at [email protected].

J
John Thompson · 写过 11 条评价 · 体验于 2026-04-16 ·

教育工作者素质差。

University of the People 回复2026-04-21

We’re sorry to hear that your experience did not meet expectations, John. Please email us directly at [email protected] with more specific details so we can address your concerns and work towards a resolution. Thank you.

M
MaterM · 写过 14 条评价 · 体验于 2026-04-06 ·

我无法清醒地推荐……

它不符合西方的质量标准,如果你在西方(我的意思是更广泛的意义上,不仅仅是欧洲/美国)去从其他大学获得学位。我完全理解为什么尼日利亚人(他们似乎占很大比例)从那里获得学位,为此我尊重 UOP。 (没有对尼日利亚提出异议,但总的来说这是一个访问问题) 我无法清醒地推荐它。这是迄今为止我接触过的最不专业的大学(我觉得他们被允许这样称呼自己很奇怪)。

University of the People 回复2026-04-09

We’re sorry to hear that your experience did not meet expectations, Jon. We're called University of the People because it's our mission to make high-quality higher education accessible and affordable to every person who's willing to learn. Our programs are accredited by WASC and are designed with input from experienced educators and industry professionals. If you have specific concerns you’d like addressed, please reach out to us directly at [email protected]!

R
Rene Jackson · 写过 5 条评价 · 体验于 2026-04-02 ·

我于 26 年 4 月 2 日注册,并且已经……

我于 2026 年 4 月 2 日注册,此后一直在等待收到在线校园和课程材料的登录凭据。我被告知需要24-48小时。后来又被告知技术问题,为什么我没有收到任何允许我进入的东西。 我想知道到底发生了什么。我注册了分析课程,每次登录时都会显示完成我的申请,但清楚地表明我是一名学生。这是可以预料的吗?我的顾问花了两天时间才回复我。我什么时候开始这门课程?这需要调查一下。

University of the People 回复2026-04-09

Hi Rene, upon checking your account, we can confirm that your login credentials were already sent to you. We recommend checking your inbox carefully, including your spam or junk folders, as the email may have been filtered there. Our team has already reached out to you directly regarding your other concerns. If you have any questions in the meantime, please email us directly at [email protected].

R
Radi Radi · 写过 3 条评价 · 体验于 2026-04-05 ·

我一直在努力寻求帮助……

过去一个月我一直在努力寻求帮助 每次回复需要 2 至 3 个工作日。回复都是从脚本复制过来的 我的重新注册费已处理。他们很高兴拿了钱,但没有为我注册任何课程或修复我的帐户

University of the People 回复2026-04-09

We’re sorry to hear that your experience did not meet expectations, Radi, please email us directly at [email protected] with more specific details so we can address your concerns and work towards a resolution. Thank you.

O
Opinologo · 写过 7 条评价 · 体验于 2026-04-01 ·

“立即聊天”功能已关闭,您...

“立即聊天”功能已关闭,您无法获得紧急支持。 顾问一直在更换,因为没有人愿意在这里工作。教授们感觉人工智能坐在那里什么也不做。 他们利用我的奖学金来提高我的价格,并试图榨取一些额外的钱,然后退还0。 从这里获得学位是名声不好的——而且与这些低等人打交道,做低质量的工作而受到折磨也是名声不好的。 逃跑。

University of the People 回复2026-04-04

We’re sorry to hear that your experience did not meet expectations, Opinologo. The “Chat Now” feature is now operational, and any temporary delays are typically due to high volume. Additionally, our chatbot provider unfortunately experienced a system-wide outage, which may have contributed to the disruption you faced. Regarding advisors, we may connect students with the first available representative at times to ensure the fastest possible support. Our WASC accreditation reflects our academic standards and reputation. Also, our scholarship policies are not changed arbitrarily. All our academic and scholarship policies, along with other relevant guidelines, are publicly available on our website for full transparency: www.catalog.uopeople.edu If you believe there has been an error in your case, please reach out to us at [email protected] with more specific details so we can address your concerns and work towards a resolution. Thank you.

J
Jorge Alberto Fuentes Zapata · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-03-30 ·

不注册 UoPeople,你就不会毕业。

想象一下这个。您已完成所有 MBA 课程作业。你正在学习最后的顶点课程,你检查了毕业生目录,其中明确规定了最低及格分数是 73。你在最后一周,你的分数是 76。所以你很高兴,你基本上已经通过了,所以你支付了 270 美元的最后付款,只是为了锁定你的最终结果。 但突然之间,你失败了。 UoPeople 再次更新了其条款。 现在顶点课程的及格分数最低为 80/B。你的钱呢?你失去了它。 今天这件事发生在我身上。 在加入 UoPeople 之前,询问或检查毕业率/成功率。 这里很多人首先关心的是认证。虽然了解这一点很有帮助,但如果你无法毕业,或者大学会不遗余力地让你成为付费学生,即使这意味着你的成绩不及格,那也没什么关系。 看,我已经跑完了全程。您阅读的不是第一学期退学的人的评论。我正处于最后阶段的最后阶段。我在那里时一直为 UoPeople 发声。我一次又一次向我认识的每个人推荐它。但没有人告诉你,也没有指导你,也没有提醒你他们的评分标准背后的技术细节。教授们有信托义务提醒你,但他们没有。他们让你碰运气。如果您知道并检查过它,那对您有好处。但如果你不这样做,你就会损失你的钱,而大学里没有人关心。 不要入读这所大学,除非你想无限期地花掉你辛苦赚来的钱而不毕业。

University of the People 回复2026-03-31

Hi Jorge, as previously communicated by your Program Advisor, the minimum passing grade for the Capstone course is a B-. Since you received a C (76), this is considered a failing grade for the Capstone course, even though the general passing grade for other courses may be lower. We understand how frustrating this situation can feel, especially at the final stage of your program, but all our grading, academic, and refund policies, along with other relevant guidelines, are publicly available on our website for full transparency: www.catalog.uopeople.edu If you have any further concerns, please email us at [email protected] with specific details so we can review your case and work toward a resolution.

M
Mark Galvan · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-02-26 ·

对于低成本、以考试为基础的大学来说,这是一个很好的概念——但严格的规则、糟糕的支持和过时的课程使它不适合

建立一所负担得起的、以考试为基础的在线大学的想法非常好,而且可能非常有前途,特别是对于在职成年人来说。我有 3 年的大学学历和 20 多年的计算机实践经验,希望能够高效地完成学位。 不幸的是,现实与现实相去甚远: 入职和学分转移不佳:我注册后没有人给我打电话。这个过程很混乱,一开始我什至找不到 FAFSA 的学校。当我尝试从以前的大学转移学分时,他们想对每个学分收取约 17 美元的费用——整整一个月后,学分从未转移。 过于严格的入门课程:第一门课程(计算机入门和必修资源课程)过于正式。他们要求简单的论坛帖子必须有完整的 APA 引用,而缺少引用的作业会损失 20% 或更多。这感觉就像学术体操,而不是建立真正的基础知识和联系。入门课程应该帮助学生熟悉实践技能,而不是将基本讨论变成小型研究论文。 内容过时且不切实际:《计算机入门》教科书是 2020 年的,几乎没有涵盖现实世界的办公技术、云计算、编码或实际应用。实验室为零。许多学生只是重复教科书信息或分享在实际工作中不起作用的观点。 严厉的人工智能政策:该计划仅使用基于论坛的课程,而不是正式论文。如果你使用人工智能进行语法、拼写或清理(即使是你自己的写作),你必须明确引用它,否则就有被指控抄袭和可能被开除的风险。这让人感觉侮辱和过度惩罚。多年来,语法工具和寻求写作建议已经很常见。学校不应该吓唬学生,而应该教授负责任的人工智能使用。 客户服务响应通常很快,但他们通常只是解释问题而不是解决问题。讲师的答复可能需要 5 天,而且基本问题(如学分转移)仍然存在。 我想要一个负担得起的学位,我可以为此感到自豪,但忙碌的工作、过时的材料、糟糕的支持和敌对性政策的结合让我感到焦灼。我现在要走一条不同的路。这所学校可能适合某些人,但如果您有先前的经验或期望实用、高效的学习,请仔细阅读负面评论并考虑您的选择。我不会回来。

University of the People 回复2026-03-31

We’re sorry to hear that your experience did not meet expectations, Mark. We understand how important a smooth onboarding and credit transfer process is, and our team has already reached out to you directly regarding your concerns. Our introductory courses are designed to establish a consistent academic foundation for all students, including familiarity with academic writing standards such as APA formatting. While this may feel rigorous, especially for students with prior experience, these expectations aim to support long-term academic success across the program. Also, our curriculum is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect current academic and industry standards, which is reflected in our WASC accreditation. In terms of AI usage, our policies are intended to promote academic integrity by ensuring that all submitted work accurately reflects a student’s own understanding and effort. We’re glad to hear that you found our response times prompt, and we regret that the program was not the right fit for your goals and wish you the very best in the path you’ve chosen moving forward. If you would like us to revisit any specific concerns, please reach out to us at [email protected]