企业入驻搜索写评价分类关于
简体中文English
活动与娱乐

LegionFarm Carry (LFCarry)

商家已认领

207 条评价

3.5207 条评价
写评价

关于 LegionFarm Carry (LFCarry)

数据更新
网站
lfcarry.com
分类
活动与娱乐
所在地
美国
状态
待认证
近 12 个月
193 条评价
差评回复率
97%(75/77 条)
是 LegionFarm Carry (LFCarry) 的所有者? 免费认领此主页,验证后即可回复客户评价。

商家自述

我们自 2016 年以来一直致力于帮助 20,000 多名游戏玩家探索新的游戏体验。 LFcarry.com 可以帮助您进行突袭、升级、评级、指导或完成任务。 《命运 2》、《全境封锁》、《魔兽世界》、《魔兽世界经典》、《圣歌》、《Apex 英雄》、《堡垒之夜》、《守望先锋》等。专业人员快速安全的服务将释放您的时间和精力 - 玩得开心!

以上内容由商家自行提供,未经平台核实。

LegionFarm Carry (LFCarry)靠谱吗?

LegionFarm Carry (LFCarry)(lfcarry.com)在 OK.one 的综合评分为 3.5 分(满分 5 分),基于本站收录的 207 条用户评价,属于活动与娱乐分类,口碑一般。评价两极分化:61% 给出 4 星及以上,同时 37% 打了 1 星;商家回复了 97% 的差评;近 12 个月新增 193 条。数据最后更新于 2026-08-12。

评价综述

AI 生成

评估了 218 条评论,评论者对这家公司的体验非常好。客户一致称赞员工和职业选手在处理请求时异常快速、乐于助人且专业。人们注意到该平台易于导航,并且整个提升过程从开始到结束都运行顺利。 然而,一些人提到了令人沮丧的问题,如意外的付款费用以及订单开始前的严重延误。消费者还表示,在尝试解决长时间的日程安排问题或获得退款时,没有收到客户支持的任何有用回复。审阅者对缓慢的沟通和未能正确解决他们紧急帐户问题的自动响应感到失望。

本段由 AI 基于该企业的全部评价自动归纳,仅供参考,不代表平台立场。

用户怎么说

服务不是很好

- 服务完成了,但有时需要花很多时间才能找到“职业玩家”,如果你想要更快的订单,你必须额外付费。 - 一位“职业玩家”删除了我的红色边框,而不是提取图案。 - 我取消了一个订单,因为找到职业选手的时间太长,后来我发现,如果我想使用取消的积分,我最多只能拿走该积分的 50%,然后再次支付待处理的金额。

我还没有能够得到我的报酬...

我已经很长一段时间拿不到工作报酬了。这些评论的答案中只有承诺。他们要求我写信给亚历克斯,表示不和谐。我写了,哪一天我被忽略了。所有屏幕截图和证据均可用。

LegionFarm Carry (LFCarry) 回复2026-08-10

This is your fourth one-star post about the same thing, and not one of them describes a purchase. You have never bought anything from LFCarry. By your own words in these reviews you worked as a booster — "worked on this site as a booster for more than 5 years", "has not paid me for the work done". That is a contractor payout matter between you and the company. Trustpilot is a platform for customers to describe buying and service experiences, and a work-and-payment dispute is not one of them. We have reported all four posts on that basis. Contractor balances are settled where contractor balances are settled: the Pro community, through the handle you were already given. We work through those every week. A fourth post here does not move a balance and tells a buyer nothing about buying a boost. If you consider yourself a customer, reply with the order number, the checkout email and the purchase date. You were asked for exactly that on 4 August and again on 6 August. Both times you returned contact details and no order reference — because there is no order.

两年后试图挑战负面评论

我在 2024 年发布了对 LFCarry.com 的最初负面评论。现在,在 2026 年,他们突然对其进行评论,并要求我提供两年前发生的交易的参考号和附加信息。 严重地? 大多数人不会将游戏服务的订单号、参考号、电子邮件和文档保存多年,以防公司有一天决定质疑他们的审查。 让人特别怀疑的是时机。为什么要等两年才能调查负面评论?当人们无法再提供所要求的信息时,要求客户在几年后提供旧记录创建了一种非常方便的方式来质疑负面评论。 从我的角度来看,这看起来更像是一种清理负面评论并提高其在线声誉的尝试,而不是解决客户投诉的合法努力。如果 LFCarry.com 真的关心发生的事情,当我最初在 2024 年发布投诉时,他们有很多机会来解决我的投诉。 我的负面评论是基于我在这家公司的实际经历。两年后,他们决定回来索要我不再拥有的信息,这是可以理解的,但这并没有改变这种经历。如果说有什么不同的话,那就是他们现在处理这件事的方式让我对 LFCarry.com 的看法变得更糟了。 潜在客户应该能够看到诚实的负面体验,而不仅仅是多年后验证要求中幸存下来的评论。 我不会推荐 LFCarry.com。

LegionFarm Carry (LFCarry) 回复2026-08-09

Let us put the actual record next to this post. You placed 160 paid orders with LFCarry between August 2020 and June 2024 — $57,870 of business, with no refund outstanding on the account. In those six years you have written nine reviews of us here. Every single one is one, two or three stars. Not one four. Not one five. You kept coming back and buying, year after year, and not once did you tell anyone reading this page that anything went right. This latest post is not a review of a purchase. You have not ordered from us since June 2024. It is a post about a verification email. You already have a live review covering the 2024 experience, so this is a second review of the same thing, which is not what this platform is for, and we have reported it on that basis. On the verification request itself: it went to reviews that carry no order reference. Yours carries none. Asking for one is the ordinary way a review gets verified and it is available to every company on Trustpilot. You are free to decline. You are not free to answer every email you dislike with a fresh one-star. If you want this treated as a genuine service complaint, give us the order number and the checkout email for the transaction you are describing in 2026. Our records show there isn't one.