I am a fiction writer. I compared three Voice Memo recorded files employing AI only against three similar length paid files using human transcription.
AI was moderately OK: it still had problems with quote attribution, grammar, and names misspelling which I thought I had averted by recording my files with grammar commands plus spelling. As is typical with AI, it takes a lot of time to clean up the errors the machine makes.
Then I paid for 3 theoretically "human transcribed" files of similar length to the test files above, also using spoken grammar and spelling commands. My files were all delivered so fast that no human being could have even opened them, so my impression is that I got the AI product without human level accuracy. In some respects, the human transcribed files had more mistakes, though why is a mystery.
Not worth the money in my view for the accuracy I want. Very disappointed since Rev has stellar reviews. Maybe no one gives a damn if you're only transcribing meeting content but anyone who wants to publish from these files where spelling, grammar and clarity are valued, it isn't worth the cost. I'd rather pay a human I know who knows the rules of composition. Bummed because it sounds like such a great solution.