The output quality is strong
The output quality is strong — better than most platforms I’ve tested — and when it works, the final product can be impressive. That said, it is pricey, and the system can burn through credits quickly, especially when you’re fixing internal issues you’d expect to be covered. I’ve also run into technical glitches. One project cost me around 2k credits, and support only restored 500. I don’t want to discourage anyone from using the platform, because the results can be excellent, but it’s important to know that some projects may require extra steps or workarounds to get the outcome you want. A few of my attempts were abandoned entirely because the generation kept drifting away from the direction I needed. So yes — there are technical issues. But if you’re intentional with your prompting and willing to push through the bumps, you can still end up with something genuinely golden.