high self-esteem guru
First, I want to say that the CEO, as the head instructor, is a very responsible person. He oversees his students' trading learning with utmost responsibility and maintains a weekly Zoom online session. His strategies, if mastered, are a powerful system. However, I dislike his self-righteousness, and that's just my personal opinion. He doesn't tolerate even the smallest of things. If a student makes a mistake or sends the wrong message, he'll be stern and direct in front of everyone, creating a tense and uneasy atmosphere in the community. The CEO also has a high self-esteem. During weekly Zoom sessions, if a student (a newstudent) doesn't answer his questions, he'll harshly reprimand all the students online. (This is why I no longer attend Zoom sessions, but instead wait for him to post a screenrecording before making up for it, only to have to endure his criticism in the video.) He has also been changing his community system, but he has also cancelled the benefits for old students. For example, I was a student who had just started at litfx. The original terms and conditions stipulated that I would pay a one-time fee and could enjoy the benefits permanently (weekly zoom sessions, permanent screen recording refreshments). However, after he made progress, he cancelled all the benefits for these old users, leaving only a sentence saying that it was for the progress of the community. This is very unfair. -------------------- This is a response based on your reply. I admit I'm vulnerable, but I'm incredibly motivated and eager to trade and learn new things. You mentioned that everyone gets their payout based on their attitude, and I've achieved that through my own efforts. I've repeatedly privately chatted with those generous mentors, continuously grappling with the concepts on my own, and have received the rewards I've sought. So, if you're trying to use this to criticize me, please don't; it won't work for me. If someone joins your community but can't effectively learn the material they're teaching due to real-life obstacles, and their willingness to ask questions only earns you skepticism, and you question the learning abilities of a long-time member, do you think it's wrong for them to constantly ask questions and publicly challenge them in the community? Would this encourage other more introverted members to speak up and ask questions they don't understand? You received my review, but you refused to be criticized. You continued to do what you always do: share it with your community, publicly condemning my faults and extolling your virtues. Doesn't this also confirm what I said: you, too, possess a high self-esteem? However, you also validated my words: you are arrogant and self-indulgent, unwilling to be criticized. That's why you magnified the problems I mentioned, ignoring the recognition I gave you from the outset of your review: your knowledge, skills, and attitude towards students. You could, of course, continue to share it with the public in your community, allowing them to continue to comfort you, and publicly do what you always do—condemn my review. I still say the same thing: I'm not making excuses for my own mistakes, but rather expressing my personal dissatisfaction and feedback on your teaching approach. I acknowledge your knowledge, your responsibility, and your ability. My opinion of your character remains unchanged. I hope you can continue to improve your system and make it flourish. I sincerely wish you the best.