Unethical Practices: exploitation of vulnerable population
I signed up for this matchmaking service in October 2025 and, since then, have had only one date. No other suitable matches have been provided. At the initial consultation, the company created a profile outlining my clearly stated, non-negotiable preferences, including religion, level of education, and compatible interests. However, the few introductions that were presented did not meet these basic criteria. Some individuals had different religious beliefs, others did not match the specified education level, and overall compatibility in interests was lacking. These introductions cannot reasonably be considered appropriate matches. This suggests that the company did not have an adequate pool of candidates who matched my profile and age range, yet they proceeded to enroll me and accept a significant payment for the service. Taking a substantial amount of money from a senior citizen while selling the promise of compatible matches that the company is unable to deliver raises serious concerns about exploitation and potential elder abuse. In my opinion, this reflects a deeply misleading and exploitative business practice. They deliberately mislead clients and operate unethically and dishonestly, assuming that once a contract is signed, it gives them the right to take payment without delivering the promised services. The company’s responses to reviews appear to be automated and repeatedly reference vague “next steps,” yet those steps are never clearly defined. At this point, the only meaningful next steps would be either providing a genuinely compatible match that meets the stated criteria or issuing a refund.