Payout Denied
My payout was denied under Section 10.3.10 because the company claims their software detected that my trades occurred within 60 seconds of other users, which they classify as “replicated behavior.” This accusation is both unreasonable and unfounded. My trades are placed independently based entirely on my own analysis and strategy. The company has provided no actual evidence that I participated in copy trading—only the claim that my trade timing was similar to others. In active markets, it is completely normal for multiple traders to enter positions around the same time when reacting to the same price action or technical signals. Treating this as proof of rule violations is a deeply flawed and unfair standard. What makes the situation even more concerning is that I used the exact same strategy and trading approach to pass the challenge and become funded in the first place. At that time, there was no issue with my trading behavior. Now, when it comes time to pay out profits, the company suddenly claims that the same activity violates their rules. This inconsistency raises serious concerns about whether these rules are being applied fairly or simply used as a justification to deny payouts. The company appears to be making accusations based on assumptions rather than verifiable proof. Simply detecting that traders entered positions around the same time does not demonstrate coordinated copy trading. If that standard were applied consistently, it would implicate a large portion of their user base who naturally react to the same market conditions. This raises an important question: am I being singled out, or are all traders who happen to trade around similar times being denied payouts as well? If the latter were true, it would expose a systemic issue in how the company enforces its rules. If not, then the selective enforcement of this policy is equally troubling. Either way, denying payouts based on such vague and speculative reasoning undermines the integrity and credibility of the platform.