企业入驻搜索写评价分类关于
简体中文English

J P

英国

3 评价
4 被浏览
0 有帮助

3 条评价

Mars Hydro

This is the offer a PayPal payment that…

This is the offer a PayPal payment that was accepted by me and then RETRACTED by mars hydro Hello JP, Hope you're doing well. Thank you for your messages. We have read them carefully, and we fully understand your frustration. We sincerely apologize for the distress this situation has caused you. We would like to address your concerns openly and honestly. 1. Regarding the warranty period You are absolutely right. When we provided you with the replacement light, we failed to clearly inform you that the warranty period for that unit was 1 year (as it was a refurbished/temporary replacement unit), rather than the standard 5-year warranty for new products. This was our oversight, and we take full responsibility for it. Because we did not communicate this clearly at the time, we have decided to honor the 5-year warranty for your unit when calculating the depreciation value, even though the unit was not purchased as a new product. 2. Regarding the usage time We also understand your clarification that you have only used the light for approximately 1–2 weeks in total (when your original light was being repaired) and then again starting in June, not continuously for 7 months. However, our warranty period begins from the date you received the light. Based on the above information, we would like to offer you a discount of the 79.79£. We understand that you prefer a PayPal payment rather than store credit, and we are happy to accommodate that. However, we are sorry, but because your order is over 7 months old, we can not refund the price directly. Would you like to accept the 79.79 £ discount? We understand that this situation has been frustrating, and we are truly sorry for the miscommunication and for any inconvenience caused. We hope this offer demonstrates our genuine willingness to make things right. We look forward to your reply. this behaviour amounts to torture I believe jp

2026-08-09
Mars Hydro

I received the new sp3000 bridgelux…

I received the new sp3000 bridgelux light which states that the bridgelux 3030 0.2 watt smd is a comparable to the Samsung lm301h evo 1 watt but it obviously is not as i own the original sp 3000 with evo LEDs and they are not comparable the evo one is a high quality light unit 500£ roughly the bridgelux one has had its price reduced considerably to 150£ roughly this bridgelux version is not fit for purpose its extremely to hot and the light is unusable I had to turn it down all the way and raise it up as high as it was possible to stop it from bleaching and damaging my plants so is obviously not usable so I contacted mars hydro for a replacement or refund as the light was unusable due to the extreme temperature and the light intensity was obviously incorrect they tried saying that I was not using it correctly but I used it to the manufacturer instructions and it failed in all areas they also tried to give me lessons on how to grow plants correctly but I explained that I have many years of experience with plants and LEDs they have called me a liar basically and much more thay are overdriving the bridgelux LEDs causing extreme heat and unstable light conditions which can be extremely dangerous in my opinion but they have reused a refund and offered me another of the same light second hand repaired and wanted me to pay more money for another light that is not fit for purpose this company had a good reputation for high quality products but now they have a bad reputation for unusable products and have lost this customer and I believe they have lost most of their customers because they can see for them selves DO NOT GIVE YOUR MONEY TO MARS HYDRO AS ITS NOT THE COMPANY THAT IT USES TO BE JP ALSO THE CUSTOMER SERVICE HAS CHANGED AND ITS EXTREMELY BAD

2026-08-07
Mars Hydro

I received the new sp3000 bridgelux…

I received the new sp3000 bridgelux light which states that the bridgelux 3030 0.2 watt smd is a comparable to the Samsung lm301h evo 1 watt but it obviously is not as i own the original sp 3000 with evo LEDs and they are not comparable the evo one is a high quality light unit 500£ roughly the bridgelux one has had its price reduced considerably to 150£ roughly this bridgelux version is not fit for purpose its extremely to hot and the light is unusable I had to turn it down all the way and raise it up as high as it was possible to stop it from bleaching and damaging my plants so is obviously not usable so I contacted mars hydro for a replacement or refund as the light was unusable due to the extreme temperature and the light intensity was obviously incorrect they tried saying that I was not using it correctly but I used it to the manufacturer instructions and it failed in all areas they also tried to give me lessons on how to grow plants correctly but I explained that I have many years of experience with plants and LEDs they have called me a liar basically and much more thay are overdriving the bridgelux LEDs causing extreme heat and unstable light conditions which can be extremely dangerous in my opinion but they have reused a refund and offered me another of the same light second hand repaired and wanted me to pay more money for another light that is not fit for purpose this company had a good reputation for high quality products but now they have a bad reputation for unusable products and have lost this customer and I believe they have lost most of their customers because they can see for them selves DO NOT GIVE YOUR MONEY TO MARS HYDRO AS ITS NOT THE COMPANY THAT IT USES TO BE JP ALSO THE CUSTOMER SERVICE HAS CHANGED AND ITS EXTREMELY BAD IT IS AGAINST TRUSTPILOT POLICY TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE BUSINESS ACCOUNT ALSO THIS REVIEW IS LIVE ON ALL THESE ACCOUNTS BUT NOT THE REAL ACCOUNT AS FOR SOME REASON IT WAS REMOVED AND NO REASON HAS BEEN GIVEN CONSIDERING THAT IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS THIS ONE IT SEEMS THAT MARS HYDRO IS ABLE TO HAVE MY REVIEW REMOVED SO ITS OBVIOUSLY NOT THE REVIEW PLATFORM THAT THEY HAVE PROMISED TO PROVIDE AS THEY ARE BEING CONTROLLED BY THE BUSINESSES TO KEEP THE BAD REVIEWS OF THERE WEBSITE ON TRUSTPILOT WHICH IS A EXTREMELY UNBELIEVABLE SITUATION TRUSTPILOT REVIEW IT IS NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE JP

2026-08-04