零星。我付了运费。有缺陷的运输包装,通过美国邮政,损坏的专辑封面。最差的客户服务。拒绝协助或合理解决而不迫使我跳过不切实际的障碍。一家糟糕的公司,客户服务很差,解决能力更差。强烈建议永远不要从这家不道德且腐败的公司购买任何东西。
更新 - 我提供了一张照片,其中黑胶唱片上确实有一个碎片,导致专辑无法播放。我要求退货箱,但被拒绝了;仅提供了一个标签。他们表示运费已退还,但截至今天尚未退还。唯一的调整是 15%。我不得不在当地的唱片店购买黑胶唱片。我勉强保留了这份副本,以便将封面装框起来,使损坏的外壳不可见。我想说得非常清楚 1) 产品是用纸薄的运输容器运输的,损坏了黑胶唱片。 2) 请求解决后,这并不是一个客户友好的过程;包括更多的借口和障碍,那么任何支付送货费用的人都必须应对。简而言之——做得更好。请。
Arcline Store 回复2026-07-20Hello Earl,
We’re genuinely sorry that you was dissatisfied, but we also believe it’s important to provide the full context to all people of what happened.
The customer first contacted us on July 14 to report record damage in transit. We responded within one hour, requesting our standard information so we could properly evaluate the claim: photos of the damaged product, photos of the shipping mailer to help determine how the damage occurred during transit, and a short playback video so we could assess how the damage affected playability (if it affects).
The customer did not respond to that request. Instead, this review was posted.
Only after we replied publicly to the review did the customer respond to our email, claiming we were “conveniently asking for the package” because customers supposedly don’t keep it, implying we were looking for a reason to deny assistance. That was never the case. We never stated that the absence of packaging photos would prevent us from helping. We simply requested them because they help us understand whether the damage occurred during shipping and improve our packaging and carrier claims.
Once we clarified this, the customer finally provided photos, which showed cosmetic damage to the jacket (corners was bent slightly which creates few dents). At that point, we offered the same two solutions we offer every customer:
1) If the record was playable and the customer wished to keep it, we would provide a partial refund for the cosmetic damage.
2) If the record was unplayable, we would provide a full refund after the item was returned and inspected.
The customer rejected both options, insisting on an immediate full refund without returning the record. He also stated he would not return it unless we first shipped an empty box. Quote:
“If you want to send me a prepaid box and label to ship it back and then refund my initial payment for shipping as well; then I will send it back after I get the refund.”
We explained that we would gladly provide a prepaid return label (meaning the customer would not pay return shipping), but we are not able to mail empty shipping boxes to customers. We also explained that any suitable box from home would work, as is standard practice for e-commerce returns, and that our return policy requires us to receive and inspect the item before issuing a full refund.
After several conversations, we reached the resolution proposed by the customer. Although the customer had repeatedly described the record as “unplayable” and declined the option of a full return and refund, they ultimately chose to keep the item. As a goodwill gesture, we processed a refund for the full original shipping cost plus a 15% partial refund for the cosmetic damage.
We’re always committed to resolving issues fairly and respectfully. Every transit damage claim is reviewed individually, and we offer prepaid returns whenever a product is confirmed to be defective. We also strive to provide options that best fit each customer’s preferences while applying our policies consistently to everyone.