⚠️ 警告:EBYCCO 诈骗、诱饵和虚假广告
2025 年 7 月 30 日,我以 599 美元的价格购买了 EBYCCO 的“翻新 29”E8”电动自行车(广告上说 1,199 美元可享受 50% 折扣)。真正的新款 E8 售价为 800 美元——“50% 折扣”的说法纯属虚构。
在我处理完翻新自行车的付款后,EBYCCO 声称它突然无法使用,并迫使我支付新 E8 自行车的差价。当我提出改用翻新的 G7 时,这个选项也“神奇地”消失了。
几周后,在来回发送了 11 封电子邮件之后(截至 2025 年 8 月 12 日),他们最终以书面形式承认,他们向我发送了一辆翻新自行车,而不是新自行车,但保留了我的额外付款。这辆“新”自行车到达时有划痕并且明显被使用过,这使得他们从一开始就在做什么。
EBYCCO 拒绝退还差价或提供适当的解决方案。这不是一次意外——这是一个精心策划的、具有欺骗性的销售计划,旨在从客户那里收取更多的钱,但交付的产品却低于承诺的水平。我附上了自行车抵达时状况的照片证明以及他们要求我“检查我新购买的翻新 E8”的电子邮件。
所附照片包括:
EBYCCO 自己的电子邮件的屏幕截图,要求我“检查我新购买的翻新 E8”——这是他们承认的不可否认的证据。
被划伤的前悬架锁转盘的特写,显示磨损与新自行车不一致。
开箱即用,品牌徽标附近的顶管油漆上有划痕。
曲柄臂和车架上的油漆剥落和磨损进一步证明这辆自行车曾被使用过。
如果您重视诚信、诚实并希望获得您实际支付的产品,请在购买前搜索“EBYCCO 骗局”,然后将钱转而购买 Rad Power Bikes 等值得信赖的品牌。我还将很快在 Reddit 上发布详细的帖子,其中包含整个电子邮件交换和其他证据,并将在发布后使用链接更新此评论。
在他们的回复中,EBycco 仍然没有提供明确的、无可争议的证据来证明我收到的自行车实际上是全新的。如果他们只是提供可验证的证据来支持他们的主张,整个问题可能会在几分钟内得到解决。相反,他们选择争论、进行个人指责,并忽视这个基本问题。
以下是事实和文档:
订单确认和交货记录 – 我收到了来自 EBycco 自己的多封官方电子邮件(可提供屏幕截图),说明我的订单是“翻新的 29” E8 750W 48V 17.5Ah 二手电动自行车待售” - 包括 2025 年 7 月 29 日的交货确认。这直接与他们声称我收到了一辆全新自行车的说法相矛盾。
自动审核请求 – 交付几天后,EBycco 向我发送了两份针对我订购的翻新 E8(而不是“全新”)的自动审核请求。如果他们的内部记录确实反映了一辆全新的自行车,为什么他们的系统会反复要求我审查翻新型号?
提供 40 美元删除我的评论的优惠 – 2025 年 8 月 12 日,我收到一封来自 EBycco 的电子邮件,其中写道:“请删除您在 Trustpilot 上的评论,我们将退还您 40 美元。”以金钱换取删除负面评论是非常不道德的,并且充分说明了他们如何处理客户反馈。
从他们的网站上删除评论——我在他们自己的商店网站上留下了评论,后来被删除了,没有任何解释。这表明我们试图抑制负面的客户体验,而不是解决它们。
未提供可验证的证据——在我们所有的通信中,EBycco 从未向我发送过收据、装运记录、序列验证或任何其他形式的文件来最终证明这辆自行车是全新的。我完全有权质疑自行车的状况,尤其是当它到达时有划痕并且他们自己的系统将其标记为翻新时。
在这场磨难中,我一直保持耐心、专业,而且非常公正。我认为公司,无论大小,都应该对其对待客户的方式负责。这就是为什么我要分享我的完整文档(包括屏幕截图),以便其他人可以准确地看到发生了什么,而不是让我的经历被埋没。
Ebycco 回复2025-08-13Hello, Elijah.
Since our founding, EBYCCO has always been customer-centric. Having operated in the US market for many years, we strive to proactively resolve our customers' issues. Honestly, we've never encountered a customer like you, fabricating so many stories, slandering us, and threatening us to get a refund. Don't you feel a bit embarrassed?
First, the E8 on our website is listed at $799, and the image shows a 33% discount, not the "50% off" you claimed. Do you think other customers wouldn't proactively review our website before placing an order?
Second, before placing your order, you inquired about our refurbished E8. We informed you that we were out of stock and would need to wait. Because our refurbished bikes are very popular, we recommended placing your order in advance to allow for restocking and prevent other customers from purchasing them. We ship them in the order they receive. You quickly placed an order for the refurbished E8 for $599, and we informed you in advance that you would need to wait for restocking. It's not like you claimed, "After my payment for the refurbished bike was processed, EBYCCO claimed it was suddenly unavailable." We have chat records for this information.
Third, the day after you placed your order, you urged us to ship the bike. We informed you in advance that a refurbished product wouldn't be ready that quickly. Three days after you placed your order, you continued to contact us, hoping for expedited delivery and expressing your disappointment at the delay. To expedite your bike delivery, we asked if you would be willing to pay an additional $150 for a brand new E8. You told us you were only willing to pay $90, and we ultimately settled on a $100 price difference. In other words, you received a brand new E8 for $699 (a brand new E8 costs $799). You were delighted and gladly accepted this price, expressing your gratitude for our resolution. However, you have stated on other review sites that we "forced" you to pay the $100.
Fourth, we regret that the bicycle you received had some minor scratches. These were minor damages incurred during shipping. We, the EBYCCO brand, stand by our promise that the bicycle we sent was indeed a brand new one. Judging from the pictures you provided, the scratches are negligible. You requested a $100 refund, but we refused. We offered to return the bicycle to us for a full refund. However, you refused and insisted on a $100 refund. Ultimately, we reached an agreement with you to refund you $60 as compensation, which you gladly accepted. These are the details of our email communication.
Fifth, regarding the email you received requesting a review of a refurbished E8 electric bike, it was automatically sent. Your original order included a link to a refurbished E8. After you paid the $100 difference, we didn't promptly update the order to include a brand-new E8. Therefore, the system sent you a review request for the original "refurbished E8." Unexpectedly, this became evidence of your threat. If we had actually sent you a refurbished E8, would we still have asked for a review? What business owner would jeopardize their own brand in this way?
Over the past two days, we've seen your malicious comments on various social media sites. We sincerely hope you'll remove some of your fabrications, as they're quite excessive. Therefore, we contacted you and offered to refund you the $40 difference (so you actually purchased a brand new E8 for $599). However, you refused, threatening us with your comments on various review sites. You demanded a further $290 refund in exchange for removing your malicious comments and writing positive reviews. We're curious if you've used this same tactic against other businesses to obtain further refunds. Is this a regular practice? We have email records of these.
We don't want to argue about who's right or wrong. We remain committed to addressing every customer's needs, but we do so on a fair and equal basis.