10+ State Courts Cases This Year Alone: Radical Homes Lost Case SCT/15589/2026
Do not trust their curated high Google rating. Having monitored their profile for over six months, I have watched them systematically delete honest negative reviews by abusing Google's spam-reporting mechanism to conceal legitimate customer complaints. Trustpilot is where you will find the unvarnished truth. Check the State Courts public hearing lists: this small outfit has amassed over 10 consumer court cases this year alone—and they lost a case with me entirely 🍾 with a binding Money Order issued against them. No competitor in Singapore carries a dispute record this abysmal. Here is the reality behind their operation: Vanishing Acts & Logistical Chaos: An entire month of unfulfilled delivery dates throughout May 2026. Every inquiry was met with ghosting, conflicting excuses, and zero coordination with their third-party movers while they held my full payment hostage. The "Solid Wood" Lie Exposed: The dining table arrived physically damaged—a blessing in disguise. The cracked structural joinery exposed cheap, crumbly particle board/engineered composite rather than the premium "solid wood" boldly marketed on their website. In official Small Claims Tribunal proceedings, Radical Homes was forced to admit on the court record that their online listing was false and misleading. Lowball Insults & Blackmail!! Confronted with the material misrepresentation, they first flatly refused a refund, then offered an insulting 30% pittance. When I posted an honest online review, they suddenly offered a full refund—on the strict condition that I delete every public review. I refused the blackmail on principle and took them straight to court. Systematic Review Scrubbing: To keep snaring new buyers, they aggressively report truthful 1-star reviews as spam to purge them from public view. The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) is formally tracking their review manipulation under the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act (CPFTA). Decisive Court Loss & Forced Recovery (SCT/15589/2026): The tribunal ordered them to pay S$1,229. Their eleventh-hour application to set aside the order was thrown out by the Magistrate on 6 October 2026. True to form, they attempted to lowball the court debt and broke written deadlines, only remitting funds after the CASE officer directly intervened as civil enforcement via Writ of Seizure and Sale (WSS) against their workshop was being finalized. They rely on customer exhaustion to bury misrepresentation and pocket your money. Every fact above is backed by official State Courts records, tribunal minute sheets, admissions on record, and photographic evidence. Do not become case #11+. Buy elsewhere!!!
Urbanmood
Exclusivia
LOBERON
Gabafurniture
Furniture Edit
The British Pillow Company
Winksleep
The Sofahaus