WikiFX

cat island越南 · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-10-11 · 发表于 2026-10-13

Seriously

Seriously, great service! Theyre always on the ball, super proactive, and really patient-especially with newbies like me who are still learning the ropes of forex trading. Big thumbs up

Foto Ksd泰国 · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-10-12 · 发表于 2026-10-12

Not updating news from brokers.

Osama Diab埃及 · 写过 2 条评价 · 体验于 2026-10-12 · 发表于 2026-10-12

A place you can truly k ow which broker…

A place you can truly k ow which broker is better for you and also some free services they do full investigation about brokers

Scam company

WikiFX has been accused of soliciting payments from multiple brokers while also assigning ratings to legally regulated banking and financial institutions. This can potentially undermine the credibility of the institutions being reviewed and create confusion for readers and investors. In my view, WikiFX is not a reliable source of information and may contribute to misunderstandings among investors. I strongly recommend exercising caution when relying on information published by WikiFX, including the WikiFX TH page and the website wikifx.com. Investors should conduct their own research and verify a broker’s regulatory status directly with the relevant financial regulator before making any investment or trading decisions.

Abdulqader Badenjki土耳其 · 写过 4 条评价 · 体验于 2026-09-30 · 发表于 2026-09-30

Unresponsive Mediation Service - Delays in Public Exposure for Dispute Case

I submitted a formal complaint and mediation request via WikiFX EMC against PU Prime (Account 34215404) regarding $1,128.00 in arbitrarily deducted profits. The 7-day resolution window has expired without any response or resolution from the broker. Despite contacting WikiFX customer support to inquire about the delay and request moving the case to "Public Exposure" to warn other traders, I have received no update. WikiFX claims to protect traders, but delayed handling and lack of transparency on pending mediation cases fail the community. I urge WikiFX support to act on my case immediately and move it to Public Exposure.

wikifx engaged in money extortion and defamation practices

wikifx is a chinese website on the web whose activity aimed to promote specific companies which pay them money, at the same to defame other companies and reach their audience (unless they pay), it's seo affiliate marketing website, they target users who search information for specific broker, they find defamation content which in 99% cases is made up by wikifx themselves, wikifx says this company is bad, and offers to join one of their "trusted" partners. In most cases companies promoted by wikifx are main frauds, while legit companies are defamed, which creates confusion among users and company owners who became victims of wikifx activity.

saleem sk阿拉伯联合酋长国 · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-09-01 · 发表于 2026-09-18

f company don't take anyone loan this…

f company don't take anyone loan this company any one services all over staff, Mc or bc

scam company , they are cheating people don’t look wikifx for broker selection

scam company, they offer money from broker side for good star even local wrost broker have good star because of money , its a very big scam , don’t look wikifx and select broker you can lose money very easily, !!!! They are cheating people

They are not the most honest company

They are not the most honest company, in my opinion. I currently work as the Head of Business Development at a brokerage company that has been in business for five years. WikiFX gave us a negative review and, according to our experience, asked us to make payments in connection with improving our rating. We did pay or “subscribe” to their score-boosting service, after which our score improved significantly. However, after we stopped paying, our score dropped again. They also published an article citing negative user reviews as evidence against us. We believe at least one of those reviews was fake because the screenshot attached by the reviewer did not appear to show our platform. Despite this, WikiFX still used that review as evidence in its negative coverage of our company. All of this happened within weeks of us stopping the payments. Based on our experience, I would advise brokers to be very cautious about paying for these services. As for traders, I would also recommend independently verifying the information and reviews published on the platform. In our experience, we have serious concerns about whether its scoring and review system treats paying and non-paying brokers impartially.

i cant post my comment

i cant post my comment, i think this bad site

I reported wrong information many times…

I reported wrong information many times but nobody fixed it.

They write negative article first then…

They write negative article first then offer commercial cooperation. Very funny business model.

UPFOREX | Upglobal Markets Ltd毛里求斯 · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-03-15 · 发表于 2026-07-20

One star – I wish zero stars were possible....

Our experience with WikiFX was extremely disappointing. From our perspective, the platform appears to create a system where businesses are encouraged to purchase paid services or reputation-related products to improve their visibility and ratings. We chose NOT TO purchase these services. After declining to proceed, we found content about our company that we believe was misleading and damaging to our reputation. Despite providing supporting information and requesting that our concerns be reviewed, they never gave us a satisfactory revert. instead they went and termed our company as an unregulated company in their articles and blogs and went ahead and promotedthe same. In our opinion, a platform that influences public perception of financial companies should have a transparent methodology, with a licenced or verified regulator on their heads to verify regulatory information carefully, and provide a fair, impartial, and efficient correction process in which WIKI FX FAILS BADLY.

Dr.Ahmed Usama Ahmed埃及 · 写过 1 条评价 · 体验于 2026-07-14 · 发表于 2026-07-15

A commercial advertising directory disguised as an independent regulator

Working within the digital marketing and content side of the forex trading industry, it is glaringly obvious how WikiFX manipulates brand visibility and scores. Their rating algorithm is not driven by legitimate regulatory compliance (such as holding top-tier FCA licenses) or genuine consumer safety. Instead, it operates on a strict pay-to-play model. When a brokerage declines their unsolicited commercial proposals or refuses to purchase pricey "profile management" packages, their rating is artificially suppressed, and unverified complaints are suddenly amplified. Retail traders must understand that these scores reflect advertising spend and commercial cooperation, not broker safety. Always verify credentials directly through official government financial authorities.

Unethical, aggressive solicitation tactics

As an employee at a forex brokerage, I am writing this to warn others about the unethical business practices at WikiFX and how this company operates behind the scenes. Our company is constantly targeted by their sales representatives via unsolicited communications. They tell us we have negative reviews on our profile, which they likely manufactured, and offer to alter, improve, or manage our public rating, but only if we pay them high monthly fees. Their content and scores reflect which brokerages pay the most for their services, rather than genuine consumer protection or trading safety. I highly advise traders to ignore these ratings completely, and for other brokers not to cooperate with the industry's bad actors.

We have valid license but they still…

We have valid license but they still marked our company as risky. Completely unfair.

Thanks wiki

Thanks wiki , great information about brokers , and great free service vps

Very well organized 👌

Good analysis

USELESS

It seems like they did deep research, but in reality, they appear completely indifferent to what matters most. They list trivial details like the server's IP address and country, but they didn't even bother to look into whether or not there is a license—which I consider the most basic of the basics. The fact that they just wrote 'unregulated' makes it not even worth discussing.