企业入驻搜索写评价分类关于
简体中文English

Leila

西班牙

1 评价
9 被浏览
6 有帮助

1 条评价

LG & SC Ombudsman

Totally biased in favour of the local…

Just checked previous reviews that the LGO Ombudsman and local authorities share the same solicitors firm which is Bevan Brittan - it's true which makes all the reviews here correct - there is no objective LGO Ombudsman and they need to be investigated. Also check out each individual LGO so called Advisor and see that they work for the government in some way. It's all Totally biased in favour of the local authority. Give the council all the time in the world to respond, whilst what feels like threatening deadlines to the us as taxpayers that pay for them to investigate. My impression is that they don't even bother to read the proof that is sent by us as the public and already have predetermined responses to complaints and side with the council even when the council do not provide any evidence from their side. Horrible experience and do not trust what is supposed to be objective. UPDATE: Just put the LGO Ombuds draft response through an AI checker = 73% it's an AI response - no wonder it has so many contradictions and replies that don't make sense and references to do with things that don't exist. I am not sure whether to name the so called "Investigator" yet but this is deeply concerning. I wish there was there was a forum where we could take this further and to the government as I can see there is bias against us people.

2026-08-15有帮助 6