I am Slade and this is how many girlfriends I have
Do not invest your business, revenue, or time into Epal.gg. I reached E-Star 2 within one month and provided strictly SFW services for about two months in late 2025. After my initial suspension, I was reinstated twice. The first time, I was instructed by staff to create a new account, which was suspended four days later. The evidence referenced appeared to relate to my previous suspension, despite me having been allowed to return. The second time, I spent around ten days communicating with an official to recover my main account ("Slađe"). I accepted the conditions of reinstatement, including a probationary period and an initial target of 1,500 Buffs, which was later reduced to 800 Buffs. Less than 12 hours after my account was restored, it was permanently suspended again. E-Pal has since stated this was based on newly submitted complaints and evidence. However, I did not engage in any new prohibited conduct after my reinstatement, and I was never given access to the evidence or enough information to meaningfully respond to the allegations. During the review, I was also asked, "How many girlfriends do you have?" While E-Pal later explained why the question was asked, I still found the interaction unprofessional in the context of a compliance investigation. My earlier requests for access to relevant personal data and moderation information did not result in me receiving the underlying information I had requested. Based on my experience, I cannot recommend this platform to anyone intending to build a serious business there. The moderation process felt inconsistent, lacked transparency, and left me with no confidence in the fairness of its decision-making. As a positive, E-Pal eventually responded to my official email with a detailed explanation of their decision. Therefore, 2 stars. Update following E-Pal's public response: E-Pal states below that reports and evidence cannot be publicly disclosed for "privacy and safety reasons." I understand the need to protect the identities and private information of other users. However, this raises an unresolved concern. A non-staff community member, "UrNewAddiction," claimed to have seen evidence relating to my case. I have documentation of that statement. I am not claiming that E-Pal directly provided this information to him, because I cannot establish how he allegedly obtained it. However, given E-Pal's stated emphasis on confidentiality, I believe it is reasonable to ask how information or evidence concerning my moderation case was apparently accessible to, or known by, someone outside the moderation team. I am not asking E-Pal to publicly identify complainants or publish anyone else's private information. I am asking for sufficient information concerning the allegations against me to understand and meaningfully respond to the basis of the decision. E-Pal also disputes the 1,500-Buff figure in its response below. To clarify, my review already states that 1,500 Buffs was the initial figure communicated to me and that it was subsequently reduced to 800 Buffs. I retain the relevant correspondence.