Funded X Is a Payout Scam
Funded X breached my account over a “rapid re-entry” rule, even though the trade was well within their published criteria. But the real issue? They refused to pay out $6,300 in profits. Their explanations were inconsistent, evasive, and contradicted their own rulebook. It became clear this wasn’t just poor service — it was systemic. I’m now in a group with other affected traders, many of whom were denied even larger payouts, and together we’re escalating this to Dubai’s regulatory bodies. Funded X enforces a maximum risk of just 1% across funded accounts, yet recently claimed a trader from Australia withdrew over $100,000 — despite the owner's documented links to that region. It’s another unverified marketing tactic, likely fabricated to lure traders into ultra-discounted challenges. Then, once profitability is achieved, payouts get denied under vague reinterpretations of rules. Before signing up, read the 1-star reviews. They're not random complaints — they reveal a recurring pattern of abuse. Funded X thrives on fake hype, false testimonials, and technicalities designed to avoid paying legitimate earnings. Traders deserve better. UPDATE following Funded X’s reply: Funded X claims that all breaches are backed by “full trade data” and that their teams provide “detailed, documented reasoning.” I have not received any such explanation. I was breached for the “rapid re-entry” rule despite a 22-second gap between trades — well beyond the 15-second threshold their own support confirmed as acceptable. I’ve asked repeatedly for clarification and documentation, but support stopped replying and refused to explain why my payout was denied. If Funded X truly stands behind its processes, it should be willing to show traders the exact data and logic used to justify breaches. Until then, their claim of transparency does not match my experience.