Wallets should act as neutral gateways…
Wallets should act as neutral gateways to decentralized ecosystems, not arbiters of which chains deserve visibility. If Rabby took issue with PulseChain’s design or compliance, clarity would at least allow users to make informed decisions. Instead, the silence or vague reasoning (if any) leaves room for speculation: Is this censorship? A conflict of interest? Or deference to industry gatekeepers hostile to alternative chains?