I watched an interaction in the chat…
I watched the entire exchange and it raised serious concerns about the project’s transparency. A team member claimed that v1 had been shut down in stages before the app switched to demo mode. They said this announcement had been posted in the news channel. A user, who was completely polite and calm, tried to verify that claim by searching the news channel directly using Telegram’s search for the term “v1.” Their search returned results, but none of them contained any announcement about a staged shutdown or v1 ever being live. The user asked for clarification and requested a link or even a rough time frame. The team eventually replied with a link, but the link only pointed to another message that again referenced the news channel. The supposed announcement still did not appear anywhere. At no point did the team provide the actual message, a screenshot, or a timestamp. It became a loop of pointing back to the same channel that did not contain the information they insisted was there. When the user, still being polite, asked again, the team issued a FUD warning. About a minute later, that warning was quietly removed. From an observer’s standpoint, it looked like the team realized the warning made them look bad and tried to walk it back. The combination of no evidence, circular references, a premature FUD warning, and a silent removal of that warning was not a good look. It made the situation appear evasive and suggested that the original claim about the staged shutdown may not have been supported by any real documentation. Anyone paying attention would walk away concerned. Yikes! I have screenshot proof of the whole interaction incase they try to delete or take down that interaction.