Because I can't give them a zero star rating
They are more bothered about appearing reputable than denying Fraud! Anybody looking to use these guys should be aware that I am going pursue action against these criminals until they are not allowed to operate in the UK anymore. I sent FX2/Prop Account a formal legal notice on 14 November 2025 alleging multiple criminal fraud offences under the Fraud Act 2006, specifically detailing that they issued me a contract with a company that did not legally exist. Their Trustpilot response? More BS. What they conspicuously failed to address: My contract was issued 25 September 2025 with "Forest Park FX LTD" - a company that ceased to exist on 30 July 2025 when it became "Prop Account Ltd" The contract has NO company registration number or registered office address - this is a criminal offence under Companies Act 2006, ss.82-84 in the UK. At no point have they denied this. The contradiction between their published information stating traders can withdraw after a hard breach, and their apparent "policy" refusing payment Their admission the GooeyPro platform was defective (no volume data, VWAPs, or volume bars), yet they kept collecting fees and refused refunds. The Non-Existent Company Issue This is the most serious concern: I contracted with a company that didn't exist. Forest Park FX Ltd became Prop Account Ltd on 30 July 2025. My contract was issued nearly two months later with the non-existent company name, missing all legally required company information. I have a second contract with "Prop Account LC" in the Cayman Islands - yet another different entity. What Actually Happened I have ~$5,000 in profits across two funded accounts. I breached daily drawdown on one account - I confused rules between firms. However: My contract explicitly states (Section 5): "Forest Park agrees to pay you the percentage of gains generated in the Account" Nothing that I have been sent or made aware of says anything about non-payment on breach. They cited a "policy" and have been unable to provide evidence of how this was communicated to me - or even demonstrate the existence of this policy. Prop Account Ltd operates a white-label prop firm business (propaccount.com). For $3k, anyone can launch a "prop firm" in 5-7 days. They claim 110+ white-label firms. The partner takes 30% of challenge fees; Prop Account handles "enforcement" and "payouts." This creates obvious incentives: profit from selling challenges to failing traders, not paying successful ones. Platform Issues GooeyPro had NO volume data - no VWAPs, FRVP, or volume bars. FX2 admitted it was defective in WhatsApp, refused refunds, refused platform changes, and blamed me. Only when I threatened legal action did they suddenly "make an exception." The Real Cost Challenge fees: ~$880 Unpaid profits: ~$4,450 Real economic impact: Over $20,000 in losses and opportunity cost Their response to my initial review says "everybody knows" that firms don't payout when rules are breached. So why doesn't it say that in their dodgy contract? Why have they been unable to provide any evidence to me of their policy? Because it's a scam. They're more bothered about pretending to be reputable then they are about addressing: Criminal fraud allegations Issuing contracts with a non-existent company Missing statutory company information Contradictory withdrawal policies Defective platforms Any specific legal violations I detailed They can't deny them. I now have to waste yet more time pursuing legal and regulatory action against them. The fact they won't address the fundamental legal issues - particularly issuing a contract with a company that don't exist - tells you everything. I've abandoned my accounts due to concerns about the legality of their entire operation. Save yourself the time, money, and frustration. Trade with legitimate firms that have proper legal structures, functional platforms, and consistent policies.