企业入驻搜索写评价分类关于
简体中文English
公共及地方服务

LG & SC Ombudsman

100 条评价

1.1100 条评价
写评价

关于 LG & SC Ombudsman

数据更新
网站
www.lgo.org.uk
分类
公共及地方服务
所在地
美国
状态
待认证
近 12 个月
62 条评价
差评回复率
0%(0/99 条)
是 LG & SC Ombudsman 的所有者? 免费认领此主页,验证后即可回复客户评价。

商家自述

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, We are the final stage for complaints about councils, all adult social care providers (including care homes and home care agencies) and some other organisations providing local public services. We are a f...

LG & SC Ombudsman靠谱吗?

LG & SC Ombudsman(www.lgo.org.uk)在 OK.one 的综合评分为 1.1 分(满分 5 分),基于本站收录的 100 条用户评价,属于公共及地方服务分类,口碑较差。98% 的评价为 1 星,差评比例偏高;商家尚未回复差评;近 12 个月新增 62 条。数据最后更新于 2026-09-05。

评价综述

AI 生成

Most reviewers were let down by their experience overall. Consumers frequently highlighted the exceptionally poor service, pointing out that response times took many frustrating months or even years to arrive without proper updates or clear explanations. People frequently mentioned that communication could be improved, noting that some concerns felt overlooked and that greater transparency would be appreciated. Some reviewers were happy with the staff, noting polite interactions and isolated instances where investigations were handled smoothly and justice was successfully served. A few individuals also found the initial communication pleasant before encountering deeper procedural frustrations and template responses during their appeals.

本段由 AI 基于该企业的全部评价自动归纳,仅供参考,不代表平台立场。

用户怎么说

小心:这只看门狗已经不会叫了

我转向地方政府与社会关怀监察专员("LGSCO" / "LGO"),希望能有个公正的裁判。结果却发现,这个机构拼命替地方政府辩护,却对像我这样的残障投诉人百般推诿。 1. 敷衍了事、走形式的"调查": 1.1. 尽管伦敦纽汉区议会承认了多项错误(错误记录我的姓名、延迟第二阶段审查九个月、关于学生地方税减免的指示含糊不清、未能批准我的学生地方税减免等),LGO 仍以"可能的错误未造成重大不公"为由拒绝调查。 1.2. 调查员认定纽汉区议会当时未支付的象征性100英镑赔偿已足够,便结案了事,甚至没要求议会纠正错误或证明是否/何时支付了这笔赔偿。 2. 平等法案?什么平等法案?: 2.1. 我多次要求合理调整(仅用通俗易懂的英文邮件、分段编号)。结果收到的却是无法阅读的门户网站消息和千篇一律的信件。 2.2. 我投诉后,一位评估经理冷冷地回应说,平等法案并不要求 LGO 回答我想问的所有问题。这种轻蔑的语气足以说明他们对残障人士的态度。 3. 威胁代替回答: 3.1. 我申请复核后,LGO 警告说,如果我试图申请司法复核,他们将追讨2000至3000英镑的费用——这种恐吓手段更像是咄咄逼人的律师事务所,而非公共服务监察专员。 4. 对服务投诉流程百般推诿: 4.1. 我根据平等法案提交了正式服务投诉,详细说明无法阅读的通信内容以及对我与残疾相关邮件的"可读性分析"不合格,但回复回避了所有实质性问题,归咎于"人为错误",只提供了又一次空洞的道歉。 5. 逼迫诉讼当事人上法庭: 5.1. 他们的律师后来吹嘘说,监察专员的调查结果表明我的索赔"微不足道",并威胁如果继续追究将下达费用令。 5.2. 这个监督机构的默认立场似乎是:不惜一切代价为议会省钱——即使这意味着压垮公民。 6. 总结: 6.1. LGO 标榜自己"独立公正"。我的经历表明,事实恰恰相反。 6.2. 如果你是残障人士,准备好迎接居高临天的敷衍、程序障碍和隐晦的费用威胁。 6.3. 这个本应捍卫问责制的组织,反而成了守门人,为地方政府当局提供保护,使其免受监督。 6.4. 使用务必极度谨慎——别指望他们能带来公正。

完全没用

Absolutely useless, don't waste your time dealing with these people. I spent a lot of time explaining the issue and in jumping through all of the bureaucratic hoops to submit the case. 3 months on and they will not even look at it : "It would not be a proportionate use of our limited resources to investigate this matter further." I agree with many others in their criticism of this organisation and that it should be scrapped as it is clearly not fulfilling it's purpose.

没用的机构

Since my last review nothing has happened except more dumb ignorance from Hampshire CC who just keep telling me to contact the LGSCO. They have been no use at all and after two letters to "THE OMBUDSMAN" Amerdeep Somal who never answers or acknowledges personal mail why waste your time. Have now written to Mrs Williamson CEO of Hampshire CC and again never replied or acknowledged my communication. Could not even get her to answer why Hampshire CC have ignored the Ruling by the Ombudsman. I have now been unemployed for a year due to the dumb ignorance of both bodies. Amazing how when you get paid by the Public Purse any principles go out with the rubbish. The only positive from Hampshire CC was a Order of "No Contact" with me. That was after the Ombudsmans ruling which they never even mentioned to me which questioned their action against me. Why does it need one useless organisation to police another which then takes no notice. Ms Somal it would be nice if you would give me the validation of your ruling and inform me of how to get an Independant Review. Something Hampshire CC refused me after never giving me any Due Process of allowing me to Appeal. The Leader of Hampshire CC, Adams-King has also been as helpful as a dead dog ignoring my communications. Better to be ignorant than to have to be seen to be pro-active in something.

连调查都没做……他们凭什么存在!?纯属浪费。

Didn't even investigate! This is their response - "We will not investigate this complaint about the Council closing the complainant’s council tax account in error. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault causing injustice." The Council stopped my direct debit after receiving information 'in good faith' from Purplebricks that I had left the property. I had not left. I didn't noticed this until 6 months after they cancelled it. In the end I had to pay back a whole years council tax because of their error, due to them using incorrect information 'in good faith'. Sounds like a robust system, doesn't it! Ridiculous! At the end of the day I didn't do anything wrong, except fail to notice my Council Tax wasn't being taken. Ombudsman couldn't even be bothered to investigate this, apparently due to lack of evidence, despite the emails from the Council stating they had acted on third party information 'in good faith' which led to them cancelling my direct debit, isn't that alone enough evidence?! If I had the money to take this to Court I would. This was not my fault, it was theirs. Injustice.

准政府机构

由中央政府设立的准官方机构,让你可以投诉地方议会放任老人独自等死,但实际上地方议会知道他们永远不会跟他们作对。斯塔默现在正在废除所有这些准官方机构,唯独留下这一个,证明这是中央政府保护这些被政府资金饿得半死的地方议会的方式。

结果确实很差

结果确实非常差,这个组织要么得削减资金,要么得改革。它根本不能代表那些需要帮助的人!就算你有事实和铁证,它也处处敷衍你。这组织得让公正的机构定期审计,因为他们总是偏向错的而不是对的。浪费纳税人的钱!他们误导人,在争取正义时根本不管你的死活!

LGO

LGO、HSE 和慈善委员会都名不副实,根本没法用。 英国议会和 PHSO 都清楚这一点。 我的建议是花时间和精力,自己拟定一份详细的行动计划。附上相关方不当行为的事实证据,必要时配上图片。告知你已尝试交涉的人,你会把这些公开。 别怕联系上级机构。 不过要小心议员们。 祝好运,继续抗争。 没错,这国家已经烂透了。这些监管机构是罪魁祸首之一。

腐败的地方政府和社会护理……

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) is an absolute disgrace—a pathetic, useless organization that exists only to protect councils and screw over the public. They don’t investigate properly, ignore evidence, twist facts, and make excuses for corrupt councils. I sent them clear proof of wrongdoing, and they couldn’t be bothered to look at it. Instead, they dismissed my complaint without any real effort, and when I challenged their pathetic decision, they shut down communication entirely—because they can’t handle being called out on their incompetence. This is not an ombudsman. It’s a spineless, biased, back-covering operation designed to rubber-stamp council lies. The whole system is rigged against complainants, and these cowards know it. They hide behind bureaucracy, waffle on about “fairness,” but in reality, they are just puppets for the councils they’re meant to regulate. If you’re thinking of complaining to the LGSCO, save yourself the stress. They are a complete waste of time, and the only thing they’ll do is gaslight you into thinking your complaint was never valid in the first place. The LGSCO is a disgraceful, corrupt, and utterly incompetent bunch of bureaucratic clowns. They do not care, they will not help you, and they are not fit for purpose.

腐败、居高临下且令人厌恶。

得知这些人用公共资金却什么都不做,我感到恶心。我的投诉是合理的,议会甚至支持了部分诉求,但监察专员拒绝调查。我和评估员交谈时,她像对待小孩一样跟我说话,态度粗鲁,还敢说'所以你想要赔偿?!'。她真是恶劣又居高临下。看到这些评论,我真震惊于为什么没人对这种腐败体制采取行动。地方当局因为有监察专员撑腰,得以逍遥法外。真为你们那些无能且不专业的员工感到羞耻。

糟糕的掩盖行为

太恶劣的掩盖行为了。问题是,如果你走委员会的投诉程序,最后就得跟这个监察员打交道。但它一贯都在掩盖真相。最近的例子是,因为没处理违规问题,我们路上都发洪水了,甚至还有污水,但那个没用的调查员却说没问题。还有很多规划违规没处理,有些委员会都还没回复我,但在这个监察员的平行宇宙里,却声称一切都解决了。没救了。

完全是在浪费纳税人的钱

完全是浪费时间,还让我为已故的婆婆承受了巨大的精神压力。我花了好几个小时整理证据,揭露我们议会成人社会护理服务的种种问题。虽然监察专员确实进行了调查,发现议会的流程存在问题,但他们却说我们没有受到任何不公正待遇!他们甚至说,议会因为对待我们的方式而修改了3项流程和程序,并增加了资源投入,这恰恰证明他们的管理根本不合格——在议会资金紧张的情况下,想要获得额外拨款几乎是不可能的。议会不仅在面对面交流时,还在电话里给了我们错误的信息。议会没有给我们寄送信件和通信。如果这些信件和通信寄给我们了,我们就能获得做出明智决定的信息,从而为已故婆婆的护理做出正确的决策。现在我们面临着一笔超过7500英镑的护理费用账单,而议会最初曾告诉我们这笔费用会由他们承担。我真希望我在去找监察专员之前先看看这些评论。 这纯粹是浪费纳税人的钱,你花时间在这里也是不值得的,因为即使投诉了也不会有任何效果,而且监察专员明显偏向议会。

毫无用处且腐败!!!

这个机构本应监督地方当局、确保标准得到遵守,但他们简直是个笑话!我向 Calderdale Council 举报了前线服务交付糟糕的问题,因为我收到的全是借口和不负责任的回复。LGO 决定不值得调查,尽管有一次回收团队被 CCTV 拍到把回收物/垃圾扔在我花园里。明显的腐败,又一个双层政府机构。这个机构由地方当局通过我们的税收和市政税资助,所以我想知道为什么他们显然没有调查我的投诉和其他评论中提到的问题。LGO 名不副实,这些浪费纳税人大量金钱的无用的、无效的准政府机构越早被关闭越好。希望改革党在4年后当选,因为这类机构/准政府机构已经在他们的关注名单上,他们表示将关闭或彻底改革这些由我们纳税人资助的低效 costly 政府机构!!!

LGO 需要新政府审查,因为它根本不符合要求。

我遇到一个情况,地方当局否认当地狗舍从未带狗去看兽医。他们从一家自称救援组织的人那里收了钱,那人从罗马尼亚进口狗并储存在那里。救援组织老板没付钱让人照顾动物,也没为领养做准备,狗舍也没好好照顾它们,导致狗在原地死亡或变得野性无法领养。我领养的一只狗送来的时候就病了,完全没有康复就被送出来,不得不退回。它从罗马尼亚来后就没看过兽医,2023年8月在可疑情况下死在狗舍。兽医没被叫来。 地方当局驳回了我关于是否看过狗舍兽医记录的 FOI 请求。按规定必须保留记录。他们给出了误导性数据,实际上是撒谎。所以 LGO 成了最后的途径。 我联系了 LGO,尽管看了那些糟糕的评论,但我已无路可走,因为 RSPCA 只是盖章确认地方当局的回应,而狗在受苦。DEFRA 把我转介给地方当局! LGO 看了我的案件记录,但决定不推进我证据确凿的案件——有三份前志愿者的忽视报告支持。更糟的是,他们后来告诉地方当局一切正常! 不叫兽医完全违反狗舍规定。 狗继续受苦,因为英格兰没有监管救援组织老板,所以必须有真正审查狗舍的地方当局。如果他们不做,LGO 就该调查。LGO 需要被监督。

大家还看了