Deevid: AI Video Generator for Any Image, Text & Video.Deevid AI is the next-generation AI video agent designed for everyone. We utilize the world's most advanced models optimized for every scenario, including Veo3, Kling, Sora, and more. No need to compare—just open and use.Whether you start with a single photo, a line of text, or a short video clip, Deevid helps you transform it into videos in just seconds.
Written by the business, not verified by us.
Is DeeVid AI legit?
DeeVid AI (deevid.ai) has a 2.8 out of 5 rating on OK.one, based on 447 user reviews collected here. It is listed under Media & Publishing and its reputation is poor. Opinions are polarized: 43% rate it 4 stars or higher while 40% give 1 star; The business has replied to 1% of negative reviews; Reviews mostly discuss User experience, Product, Quality. Last updated 2026-10-24.
What reviewers say
AI generated
Most reviewers were somewhat happy with their experience overall. Consumers find the platform quite useful for creating images and videos, appreciating the high quality results when it works properly. People enjoy exploring its diverse features and note that the tool offers fun and creative ways to generate digital content.
Some reviewers were not happy with the strict credit system and unexpected subscription costs. Customers mentioned that frequent mistakes made by the software consume expensive credits without offering refunds or easy corrections. Users also noted that getting desired results often requires precise prompts and sometimes leads to unexpected errors during generation.
Auto-generated from all reviews of this business. For reference only.
Some results are genuinely stunning and unbelievably realistic - modern photographic realism often generated from just one sketch drawing (I find the more reference images you use, the more it compunds mistakes). My best results are exactly what I'm after. Despite very detailed prompts though, there are almost always unwanted mistakes, and I spend literally hours using 'erase' on Microsoft photos and Paint 3D - sometimes freehand - (I'm quite a good forger), to try to correct! It's great at cleaning up and colourising old photos but it changes faces too much to recognise the people wanted (some 5-second videos didn't do that, but others did) Other results can be laughably awful and are only kept to do that - laugh. Unfortunately, that's where most of my credits go! It reminds me of using 35mm film - a 36-shot film would often only give me one or two really good photographs and the rest might be okay-ish or useless. Anyway, I give it four stars for the fantastic results that I can really use. It did originally give me the feeling that the mistakes were deliberate to use up credits - but I'm just a bitter, old cynic!
Quite happy with the results ...
Important constraint is that the prompt is not always properluy interpreted. After extending the prompt (which should not be needed in some cases), you have to pay again.
Might be an option to provide a none dowloaded low quality preview.
The concept behind this is great but the pricing should be based on success. The Ai often agrees that it makes errors, but the consumer still pays. I read other reviews and the review summary, it is spot on. The credit system is a failure, much too expensive when you include paying for Ai errors. Sure we humans will always make them, but a learning curve needs to be provided for. As a hobbyist a monthly subscription would suit me better. Once my credits run out so will I. Hope you can make this more Human friendly. Regards Tony P. Mt Barker, Australia
I am satisfied with the results when I create images based on reference drawings. There can be up to 5 of them with some models, which is sufficient. As for the creation of images, some are very nice. The animation is usually weaker, or rather the original objects are simplified and distorted, especially faces. What works with very little success is editing images, where the AI often does not understand the description. Moreover, editing is very expensive in terms of credits, so it is generally not worth editing a generated image. I have been using Deevid for several months and it looks like I will be for some time.
My experience has largely been positive, but so far I've only used it for limited requests. The results are often excellent. When I am dissatisfied, it is because the results are mistaken or incorrect interpretations of the prompt, as when (for example) a vehicle in the photograph moves backwards, yet the people walk forward.
I like that the software allows you to input prompts without always saying that a harmless word violates its safety policies. On a different app I wanted it to create a scene with people swimming in a lake and I couldn't even say "swim suit". However I do think that this Ai software makes a lot of mistakes that require multiple edits, and the edits are costly.
The website consistently fails to follow clear instructions, and the results are often poor quality. Even after providing specific directions, the output does not match the request and requires significant corrections. The platform needs better instruction-following, accuracy, and consistency before it can be considered reliable.
I work in audiovisuals and I'm just starting to work with AI. And the experience has been really good because it's very easy to use and the different sections fit well with what I wanted to achieve.
I'm really enjoying this app. As simple as it is, it can produce just what you want; the beautiful thing about AI is that you can use one AI assistant to help another. For example, when I want to make just the right video, I use Copilot to write the prompt for me and over 95% of the time, I am pleased with the final product. It's quite versatile. The songwriting tool is also fantastic!!
good and reasonable results, ai is sometime confused with community guide line, and image that it has its self produced, when re-imported can be flagged as a community violation, thought it makes a good image, it is case sensitive, and can ignore a word, then produce a first class image that has nothing to do with the prompt
Having used it since 2025, I found that it is quite good at creating images and videos. However, it consumes a lot of credits.
Since there are no discount events, it is a significant burden to use. Therefore, it is difficult to use it frequently. If it were a bit cheaper, I think I could use it without any burden.
I've been using Deevid AI to animate still images for an educational audiovisual project. When it works well, the results are impressive, especially for atmospheric effects, subtle character movement and bringing static scenes to life. The interface is easy to use and image-to-video generation is straightforward.
The main limitation I've found is consistency between reference frames. For scenes requiring very precise continuity, the AI can sometimes change details, geography or composition, which means several generations may be needed to get the desired result. As each unsuccessful generation still uses credits, they can be consumed quite quickly and the included credit package may run out sooner than expected. Purchasing additional credits is also relatively expensive, which can make repeated attempts costly. More control over camera movement and stronger preservation of the original images would make a big difference.
Overall, it has become a genuinely useful tool in my production workflow, and I will continue using it.
This is totally a way to scam you out of money. It creates a video and if you tweak one thing it removes something else and you have to pay to get it back in. Totally want a refund
I am incredibly satisfied with Deevid AI. The platform works great right now and consistently delivers high-quality results. What impresses me the most is that it keeps getting better with regular updates and noticeable improvements. It is reliable, efficient, and highly recommended for anyone looking to optimize their workflow!
I’m satisfied with the results from Deevid AI, but I’m unhappy
I’m satisfied with the results from Deevid AI, but I’m unhappy that the credits reset at the end of each billing period. This means I lose credits that I already paid for and that should be mine to use.
Credits should not expire at the end of each monthly cycle. They should remain available to the customer, since they were purchased as part of the subscription.
very expensive and less consumes more credits with less creative results
renews every month and resets credits without adding remaining credits from previous month which is a great loss for users
if possible i would clearly want refund for remaining months
DaVinci AI 
Pollo AI
OpenArt 
Higgsfield AI
Klingai
Artlist
Facelessreels
PixVerse