FTUK offers prop trading accounts for forex & futures markets. Traders can access instant funding, one step & two step evaluations with simple rules and fast payouts. We provide funding up to $6,400,000. Plus, you can keep up to 80% of the profits.
Written by the business, not verified by us.
Is FTUK legit?
FTUK (ftuk.com) has a 4.0 out of 5 rating on OK.one, based on 104 user reviews collected here. It is listed under Education & Training and its reputation is good. 75% of reviews are 4 stars or higher and 17% are 1 star; The business has replied to 70% of negative reviews; Reviews mostly discuss Customer service, User experience. Last updated 2026-08-12.
What reviewers say
AI generated
Reviewers had a great experience with this company, highlighting overall satisfaction with the financial services provided. Customers regularly praise the support team for being exceptionally fast, very helpful, and consistently courteous whenever they reach out with questions. Reviewers also mention that payouts are extremely reliable, processed smoothly, and delivered on time when all trading criteria are successfully met.
However, some customers also noted frustrating issues regarding unexpected payout denials and sudden account restrictions. A few other people also felt that strict withdrawal conditions, payout locker systems, and delayed customer communication made the overall trading experience much more difficult.
Auto-generated from all reviews of this business. For reference only.
WARNING: This company is a complete scam! Do not trade with them.**
> I have traded with them three times, and they pulled the exact same trick on me twice.
> **WARNING: This company is a complete scam! Do not trade with them.**
> I have traded with them three times, and they pulled the exact same trick on me twice.
> During my **first experience**, I made a profit of over $3,000. However, they refused to pay out, claiming that I had violated one of their rules. As a professional trader who has worked with numerous prop firms, I know for a fact that I did not break any rules.
> In my **second attempt**, after going back and forth with them, they provided me with a new account. Shockingly, the exact same issue happened again, and they used the same excuse as the first time to deny my profits.
> By the **third time**, they gave me another account, but I was so fed up with their manipulation that I deliberately blew (lost) the account on purpose just to get away from them.
> Please save your time, money, and nerves. Do NOT deal with this fraudulent company!
> Al Saleh MohamadOmar
It was good and now it’s amazing!! I am trading for 4 months at FTUK and I received my 2300 payout today on Thursday, I requested it Thursday morning, thank you FTUK for making my summer!
Hi Vishu,
We believe there may be a misunderstanding. From our side, your account appears to be active and not blocked.
Could you please check again and let us know if you're still experiencing any issues? If so, we'll be happy to investigate further and help you resolve them.
Kind regards,
FTUK
PREMEDITATED FRAUD: A Masterclass in Deceptive Trade Practices and Breach of Contract.
To the management of FTUK: Let’s dispense with the illusion that you are running a legitimate financial institution. You are operating an undercapitalized B-book bucket shop, and your recent actions toward my account have provided a textbook case study in corporate fraud.
I entered your ecosystem, executed precise risk management, and extracted substantial profits within minutes. At no point did I even come close to the daily drawdown limits. However, the moment my account became a liability to your internal P&L, your operation panicked.
First, you attempted to gatekeep my earned payout using a buried "Profit Consistency" rule—a classic bait-and-switch tactic designed to lock successful traders in a perpetual loop of unnecessary market exposure. When I continued to trade profitably, scaling into a position by executing a second entry 10 seconds later to optimize my average price, you instantly terminated my funded account.
Your justification? A fabricated, retroactive violation for "scaling" or "adding to a position." Let’s be unequivocally clear: penalizing a trader for standard, risk-adjusted scaling is not a legitimate trading rule. It is a desperate escape hatch used by an insolvent firm that cannot afford to pay its winners. You deliberately keep your terms vague so you can weaponize them the moment a trader outmaneuvers your system.
You do not get to arbitrarily rewrite the terms of engagement post-factum just because your rigged system is bleeding money. In the corporate legal world, this is defined as a material breach of contract and deceptive trade practices. I have cataloged every trade ledger, timestamp, and discrepancy in your terms of service.
To the CEO running this facade: Your desperation is showing. A legitimate, well-capitalized firm hedges its successful traders; an insecure, failing operation bans them. Keep the challenge fee. Consider it a charitable donation to a bankrupt business model. I will ensure this documented breach is forwarded to every major trading forum and regulatory watchdog. You didn't just lose a profitable trader today; you publicly exposed your own insolvency.
Reply from FTUK2026-07-15
Hello Efe,
We're a little confused by your review, as we can currently see two active accounts under your name. You're also listed as an active trader on our end.
Because of this, we're wondering if there may be some misunderstanding, or perhaps you're referring to a different prop firm.
Please reach out to our support team, and we'll be happy to investigate this with you. If there's been any mistake or misunderstanding, we'll work with you to clarify it as quickly as possible.
Kind regards,
FTUK
A follow up to my original review.. so when i requested a withdrawal ftuk asked me questions which i answered.. then nothing.. i begged them to send me my profit as i had earned it.. i told them id forfeit on my mortgage payment..: they didnt pay me.. 7000 they took away from me... all those trades were my own, my time.. no doubt they will reply to this to contact them via email to make them look good... I've emailed them a dozen times without response.. heartless company... go on ftuk reply to this one asking me to contact via email..again..
Reply from FTUK2026-07-14
Hello Martyn,
After you shared this message:
Martyn Saunders: "I want my money back... this is the third company ive gone with... each one ive made money for and each one has denied me my money.. im in a very dark place and i thought your company was my future.. youve just compounded my fragile mental state
Just send me back the money i paid for the accounts, thats the decent thing to do at least and keep the profits
Nova 13k funded top 8k. Now ftuk having made 4.2k. All making excuses not to pay me out... i cant take this anymore.....
For my wife..
Im sorry... it happened again... I've taken screenshots for you
I made money honestly again.. and yes excuses not to pay out..
I know.. i know you said... but i trusted this company... im sorry :pensive:
My wifes now got all the details of what your company has done to us if anything happens to me.
I would like your ceo to email me so i can arrange a meeting and tell them how disappointed and disgusted i am with the treatment ive been given and look them in the eyes and tell them they are about to make a disabled woman homeless
As a gesture of goodwill, we issued you a full refund, even though we were under no obligation to do so. We did this because we wanted to support you during what you described as a very difficult time"
It is therefore disappointing to now read your updated review. You also stated yourself that this was the third proprietary trading firm where you claimed to have been denied a payout. Given that context, it appears this is not an isolated situation.
We genuinely wish you all the best, but we also believe it is important that reviews reflect the full facts of what occurred. We stand by our decision and consider this matter closed.
Kind regards,
FTUK
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
My experience with FTUK has been very positive so far. Their customer support team is professional, responsive, and always willing to help. I recently contacted them regarding payout eligibility for traders residing in Afghanistan, and they provided a clear and prompt response that answered my concerns.
The support was friendly, transparent, and reassuring. Based on my experience with their customer service, I am happy to recommend FTUK to other traders.
Thank you, FTUK, for your excellent support.
I could not trade on the MT5 i was send to my email. So i chatted with customer service and got a new download directly from them. Tried it and worked instantly. Problem solved in 10 minutes. Fast helpservice.
Real & Very fast payout process in less than 24hrs
Very fast payout process in 24 hours or I thing even less than 24h !!,
I was really impressed and also they honor the listed eval & funded rules with full transparancy with no added barriers/obstacles like we often see on the market.
The technical support over chat was really helpfull. I got my 1st payout a week after passing my evaluation phase and I confirm that everything advertised is offered and it happens for real.
I breached my funded account after the payout.. (my mistake)
& deffinitively buying a reset tomorrow, reset is also offered instead of redoing an evaluation phase, this is another + point to FTUK.
Thank you so much and looking forward for the future payouts with FTUK & only !
BIG MISTAKE
i did a big mistake when i choose FTUK
everything looks good till i asked payout
Reply from FTUK2026-07-12
Hello Stefano,
We're sorry to hear you feel this way.
We have searched our records using the name on this review and could only find a $9 purchase. Based on our records, you have not reached the payout stage with us.
We'd genuinely like to understand your experience. Please reply to our request for information or contact our support team with your account email or account ID so we can investigate your case and assist you accordingl
Kind regards,
FTUK
Thisis a very bad propfirm,very strict rukes with trailing drawdown that will sucforcate trader,they also do not tell me about the consistency rules from the start,i am highly disappointed
I've been trading with this prop firm for the last 6 months. My first payout of $343 was approved, so naturally I trusted them.
Then I made around $2,500 in profit, but my payout was rejected. They even used trades from before my first payout as a reason, even though those same trades weren't a problem when they paid me the first time. They gave me a new account, and I accepted it.
I worked hard again and made over $4,000. This time I followed the guidance they gave me—not increasing my lot size after a losing trade. But after I requested my payout, they changed the explanation and said martingale means not increasing your overall risk percentage. That's completely different from what I was told earlier. Again, my payout was rejected.
They gave me another account, so I started from zero once again. I spent weeks trading and made almost $5,000. And guess what? They're refusing this payout too.
After six months of hard work, 300+ trades, and almost $12,000 in profits... what did I get? Nothing.
It's honestly heartbreaking. Based on my personal experience, I will never recommend this prop firm to anyone. Guys, please be careful with prop firms like this. Your biggest investment isn't your money, it's your time. Don't let anyone waste it."
Reply from FTUK2026-07-08
Hello Isha,
Thank you for sharing your feedback.
Regarding the claim that trades from before your first payout were used against you,v our review process covers the current payout cycle. If trades from a previous period were referenced, it was purely for transparency and context, not as grounds for denial.
We provided new accounts on multiple occasions as a genuine gesture of goodwill because we wanted to give every opportunity to trade within our guidelines. That is not the behaviour of a firm trying to avoid paying its traders.
We stand fully behind our decisions. However we respect your choice. We wish you all the best in your future trading!
Kind regards,
FTUK
My experience with FTUK has been extremely disappointing.
When I purchased the account, the only risk rule that was clearly presented to me was the 5% daily drawdown. I was never clearly informed that a 2% floating loss Account Protector rule could close my account.
I managed to build my account up to $19,715 in profit. After that, I had a loss of around $2,000, and FTUK closed my account because of the Account Protector rule.
I feel this is unfair because the rule that was emphasized to me was the 5% daily drawdown, which on my account would have been $5,000 per day. Closing an account after making $19,715 in profit because of a $2,000 loss feels unreasonable.
Traders deserve full transparency about all important rules before purchasing an account, not after they have already spent time building their account.
Reply from FTUK2026-07-07
Hello Louvensky,
We're sorry to hear that you feel this way and appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.
We take concerns like yours seriously and will be reaching out to you by email shortly so we can review your case together and address your concerns directly.
We look forward to resolving this with you.
Kind regards,
FTUK
Really good experience with the company so far. Entry is cheap making it an excellent choice for beginners and those traders on tight budget trying to get back into the game.
Professional Communication, but Greater Transparency Is Needed
I successfully completed the trading objectives on my funded account and submitted my payout request. During the review, my account was rejected for alleged "Martingale" trading.
My trading strategy is based on ATR-driven dynamic stop-losses, multiple timeframes, and predefined setup classifications (A, B, and C). Every trade is evaluated independently before execution. The outcome of the previous trade is never used to determine the position size or risk of the next trade.
Throughout the entire account, my maximum drawdown never exceeded **1% of the account balance**, remaining well below the firm's own guidance to keep active (floating) risk comfortably below **2%**.
The five trades identified as Martingale involved realized losses ranging from approximately **$3 to $27**, included **different trading instruments**, **both long and short positions**, and trades in both the **same** and **opposite** directions. From my perspective, these were independent trading opportunities rather than a strategy of increasing risk after losses.
The company states that Martingale is determined by calculating actual risk using **both position size and stop-loss distance**. At the same time, their published rules clearly state that **using a stop loss is optional** on funded accounts. I requested the actual risk calculations and methodology used to classify my trades, but these calculations were never provided. As a result, I was unable to understand how the rule was applied in my specific case.
Based on my experience, the firm's risk management policies lack sufficient transparency and leave significant room for interpretation. Without access to the underlying calculations, it is extremely difficult for traders to understand how their trading behavior will be assessed during a payout review.
I respect every firm's right to enforce its own rules. However, when a payout is denied based on an internal risk assessment, I believe traders deserve a clear technical explanation supported by the actual calculations used to reach that decision.
If you are considering this firm, I strongly recommend carefully reviewing the trading rules and requesting detailed technical justification for any alleged rule violation before accepting a payout decision.
UPDATE:
Thank you for your response.
My concern has never been that my trades were reviewed. My concern is that although you identified the trade tickets, you did not provide the actual risk calculations that your own policy states were used to classify those trades as Martingale.
I repeatedly requested the calculation methodology, including the calculated risk for each trade and how it demonstrated an increase in risk after a losing trade. Those calculations have still not been provided.
Without that information, I cannot independently verify or understand the basis of the decision.
**Update:**
Following my original review, the company continued communicating with me and took the time to explain their risk assessment methodology in much greater detail.
Although the final payout decision was not the outcome I had hoped for, I appreciate that they handled the discussion professionally, answered my questions, and acknowledged that my trading was structured and that my intent was genuine.
They also offered me a new account so I can trade again with a full understanding of how they apply their Martingale policy.
I still believe that some aspects of the risk assessment methodology—particularly the practical application of the Martingale thresholds—would benefit from being explained more clearly in the publicly available trading rules. Having this level of detail available from the beginning would help traders better understand how their risk is assessed and avoid misunderstandings during payout reviews.
I appreciate the respectful communication throughout the process and hope the company continues improving the transparency of its trading policies.
Reply from FTUK2026-07-06
Hi Ahmed,
Thank you for your feedback.
We value transparency and wanted to fully understand your perspective before reaching a final decision. That's why we first invited you to share your explanation and then provided a detailed response, including the specific trades that led to our conclusion. After carefully reviewing all of the information, we remain confident that our decision was consistent with our published rules.
We wish you all the best in your future trading!
Kind regards,
FTUK
FundedNext
FundingPips
FTMO
Hola Prime
FXIFY
The5ers.com
Blue Guardian
QT Funded