Reviews on their website never got published. Read this if size matters to you
Left reviews (3 stars) twice on Wandrd official website but never got published. Doing some research suggests that the review platform "Okendo" that Wandrd use, allow retailer to choose what reviews to be published. So it is highly likely that my reviews have been rejected. To get the feedback/message across for the benefits of other potential customers I have no choice but leave the review here, the low rating reflects the fact that two of my original reviews (with photos evidence too) have not been "chosen" to be published. I bought the mystery box deal in April 2026, which is no longer available now in May 2026. In fact I was asked by Wandrd to leave a review for my purchase, but unfortunately it never got published. I purchased the mystery box in first place because I was led to believe, by the advertising photo of the essential cube that it is sufficiently large to house my kits. In the mystery box, the 21L Prvke is paired with the essential cube so I thought even if I got given the 21L it would still be great, and ofcourse if I got a 31L that'd be even better (seeing 90% of the reviews of the mystery box got the 31L so that also got my hope high!). I noticed from the dispatched email that I was given the 21L, so not much of a surprise by that time, but I am still looking forward to receiving the Prvke 21L very much. Upon unboxing the parcel, I started to put my kits in it, but straightaway I noticed the essential cube is way too small. I have a Nikon D750 and when I put it together with the 24-120mm kit lens (dimensions: 84mm x 104mm) inside, almost 70% of the space is occupied. There isn't much space left to fit any other lens, unlike what the advertising photo suggest. I took out the lens hood and still doesn't help much. And when I put the dividers in, there is hardly any space left for other kits... So I started to review the advertising photos and did some research. It looks like that in the photo, the camera was a Sony A7C II paired with the Sony 70-200mm f2.8 GM OSS II (dimensions: 88mm x 200mm). The Sony lens alone would been longer than my D750 plus the kit lens, so the maths just doesn't add up, as the advertising photo suggests that even after fitting in the Sony camera and lens, there are still quite a lot of spaces to house other lens, batteries, pouch etc. I then also compared the advertising photo where the essential cube is empty vs the one filled with kits. In the photo where the cube is empty, you can see the dividers are a bit squashed, whereas when it is filled with kits, the dividers are less squashed, so that doesn't make sense again. As such, I believe that advertising photo where the cube was filled with kits is actually the "essential plus" as opposed to the "essential" version. And that's where I was misled by the photo where I thought the essential cube would be spacious enough for my kits, which in fact, it wasn't unfortunately. Finally, the advertising photo below "specification" of the camera cube page was the same regardless of whether you select the essential, essential plus or essential deep, which again is a bit misleading unless customers pay a lot of attention to it. In fact, I noticed that some other customers have left similar review that the size of the cube is much smaller than the advertising photos suggest. I still like the bag, I like the design, and that it is not manufactured in country which I try to avoid. However, it does not fit my purpose, unlike what the advertising photo suggests. But make sure you know what size you need to get, don't let the advertising photos misled you.