For businessesSearchWrite a reviewCategoriesAbout
简体中文English

Wanie Rushdi

Malaysia

1 Reviews
2 Reads
0 Useful

1 review

Airpaz

Airpaz is currently violating Malaysian…

UPDATE 12 JAN 2026: Airpaz is being dishonest. They replied here claiming they sent an email, but no email has been received (checked Inbox and Spam). This is a deceptive PR tactic to make it look like they are helping. ​ My demand remains: A full refund to my ORIGINAL MODE OF PAYMENT for Order 1033022992 (PNR: LNIMBA/IMIMAB). Flight OD670 was rescheduled by 24 hours. Under MACPC 2024, you cannot force vouchers. I have reported this deceptive behavior to @caamalaysia (Case: CAAM-009371-01-26). Stop lying on public forums and refund my money! REVIEW ON 09 JAN 2026: Airpaz is currently violating Malaysian aviation laws (MACPC 2024). After my flight OD670 was rescheduled by 24 hours, Airpaz refused my legal right to a CASH REFUND and instead tried to force an E-voucher with a 24-hour expiration timer. ​When I refused the voucher, they allowed my request to 'expire' and have since been deleting my public comments on Instagram to hide their non-compliance. ​I have four active cases with CAAM (Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia): ​CAAM-009361-01-26 ​CAAM-009371-01-26 ​CAAM-009383-01-26 ​Warning to all travelers: Do not book here. They ignore the law and suppress consumer voices. I demand a full cash reversal for Order 1033022992

2026-01-09