For businessesSearchWrite a reviewCategoriesAbout
简体中文English

Jennifer Ross

United States

1 Reviews
3 Reads
0 Useful

1 review

Puls

How to Void a Warranty That Doesn’t…

How to Void a Warranty That Doesn’t Exist: A Masterclass by Puls 🤡 If you ever want to experience the peak comedy of corporate gaslighting, I highly recommend buying a membership with Puls. My fridge stopped cooling, and after two full weeks of hostage negotiations over email while my tenant’s food spoiled, I finally had to capitulate and pay out-of-pocket for a repair I didn't even want just to get them to do their job. You literally cannot make this crap up. Please enjoy the Olympic-level mental gymnastics their "Membership Care Team" put me through: The "Pre-Existing Condition" Pivot: They refused to fix my cooling issue (the defrost heater) unless I paid them $156 out-of-pocket to fix a broken ice maker. The ice maker has been broken for years, and they knew it, because they previously serviced the unit. The Imaginary Manufacturer Warranty: When I told them I’d just handle the ice maker with Samsung later, they claimed they couldn’t fix the defrost heater because it might "void the manufacturer warranty". Guys... the fridge is from 2016 or earlier. There is no manufacturer warranty. And even if there was, Puls already worked on it in 2022, which by their own logic would have already voided it! The "Heads I Win, Tails You Lose" Guarantee: When I pointed out their logic made zero sense, they offered a "compromise": they would fix the cooling issue, but if the fridge still didn’t cool after they left, they wouldn't guarantee their work or offer a redo. So... I pay you to fix it, it doesn't work, and you just keep the cash? Solid business model. The Ultimate Paradox: They later claimed that if a different company fixed the ice maker after Puls fixed the defrost heater, it would void Puls's 30-day guarantee. So I told them: "Great, nobody else will touch it. The ice maker will just stay broken." Their response? "Well, if the manufacturer doesn't repair the ice maker BEFORE we fix the fridge, your guarantee is void anyway." Math is Hard: To top it all off, they kept threatening to void my "30-day guarantee," completely forgetting that my actual membership agreement guarantees parts and labor for 90 days. The grand finale? After days of them taking forever to reply while a fridge sat completely unusable, I gave up, and paid the ransom just to get the appliance running. How this predatory, shifting-goalpost nonsense is legal is beyond me. If you're considering a Puls membership to protect your home appliances—save your money. They will happily take your monthly fees, but when something actually breaks, they'll just hold your kitchen hostage until you pay up. EDIT BASED ON PULS REPLY: This is completely false. THERE IS NO MANUFACUTER WARRENTY. The team REFUSED to service my fridge unless I paid for an ice maker repair - which I DID NOT WANT FIXED and had nothing to do with the reason the fridge would not cool. It had been broken for years and had NOTHING to do with the fridge not cooling. They would not send anyone out to my house unless I agreed to pay for an ice maker repair. When I said I just would keep operating as normal, with no ice maker, since there hadn't been one there for years, they would only agree to repair my fridge if I waived all rights to guarantee the repairs, which obviously I would never do, especially with this company. So, if you're really going to help, you can waive the ice maker repair, which I didn't want in the first place and your team forced me to pay for simply to get the service I deserve.

2026-06-24