I like that you can earn premium…
I like that you can earn premium credits by contributing to the hot or not section.
About SubmitHub
Data updated- Website
- submithub.com
- Category
- Media & Publishing
- Location
- United States
- Status
- Unclaimed
- Last 12 months
- 108 reviews
- Replies to negative
- 69% (11/16)
Do you own SubmitHub? Claim this profile for free and start replying to reviews.
About this business
We help musicians connect with curators. Our goal is to make it transparent and easy, but we can't promise guaranteed success. Curators are picky and often to the point. The space is highly competitive and you need to have tough skin.
Written by the business, not verified by us.Is SubmitHub legit?
SubmitHub (submithub.com) has a 4.3 out of 5 rating on OK.one, based on 108 user reviews collected here. It is listed under Media & Publishing and its reputation is good. 80% of reviews are 4 stars or higher and 8% are 1 star; The business has replied to 69% of negative reviews; Reviews mostly discuss User experience, Product. Last updated 2026-08-11.
What reviewers say
AI generatedReviewers had a great experience with this company. Customers frequently praise the intuitive website interface, smooth navigation, and the exceptionally helpful promotional tools available to independent musicians trying to grow their audience. Consumers deeply appreciate connecting with genuine curators who provide honest, detailed insights and meaningful feedback to actively support long-term musical growth and success. Though some reviewers noted occasional challenges regarding small playlist sizes, strict guidelines, and temporary placement durations across various musical genres, consumers also mentioned that certain industry professionals can sometimes feel a bit inconsistent or difficult to match properly with specific artistic styles.
Auto-generated from all reviews of this business. For reference only.What people say
Great readyness
Clear information on curators . Great reactiveness
Excellent
Very easy to use. Excellent curators. No one trying to get you to pay for additional services.
Always use them
SUPER INDIE ARTIST FRIENDLY.
Possibilities SubmitHub
In addition to the ability to offer your track to playlist curators and create advertising campaigns, there are many auxiliary tools for analyzing and promoting music.
Really useful
New Artist with New Opportunities
I am a new artist that has been struggling to make any headway. SubmitHub has helped exponentially. The songs that were getting absolutely zero streams have not only been getting some attention now, but they were also picked up by a few Spotify Playlist Curators who accepted them! If not for SubmitHub my music might not have ever even been given a chance.
Used it for 2–3 years
Used it for 2–3 years, and many of my songs were accepted. In the end, though, the playlists are small (100–5,000 followers), and placements are only temporary (1–4 weeks) before you’re removed again. I don’t recommend it — save your money. Same with Groover by the way.
Reply from SubmitHub2026-03-30
Hey, glad to hear you got coverage! The playlists have to be at least 1,000 followers to qualify, and we're more interested in listeners than anything else. The first 4 weeks of a song's release on Spotify are the most important, and sharing songs for 3 or 4 weeks is pretty standard - even for Spotify's official playlists. There's just so much music out there, you gotta rotate as a curator. That said, all this information is publicly visible: you get to choose exactly who your song is sent to, and can avoid those who don't match your preferences up front.
Professional observations on feedback consistency and listening data
Hi, it's the "Brutal King" here. I’m writing because, as a producer, I found some aspects of my recent campaign on SubmitHub quite confusing from a professional standpoint. While I understand that music is subjective, I encountered diametrically opposed technical feedback on the exact same track, with one curator rejecting it because the drop felt "too dark and heavy" and another rejecting it because the drop "wasn't felt enough." This inconsistency makes it very difficult for an artist to understand how to improve or which direction to take. Furthermore, looking at the data, I noticed some curators jumping through the track at specific points, such as 0:54, 1:08, and 1:42, without listening to full structural transitions. It’s hard to evaluate a professional mix or a drop without hearing how the sections actually connect. When I see high praise for the vocals, energy, and chorus followed by a generic rejection, it leaves me questioning the actual editorial criteria being used. I believe the platform has great potential, but these inconsistencies in how curators listen and provide feedback really undermine its professional value. I’m sharing this as an invitation to look into how quality control is managed, because at the moment, it feels more like a game of chance than a structured scouting tool. ;-)
Reply from SubmitHub2026-03-30
Hi Brutal King, thanks for taking the time to share this. We understand why that experience would feel frustrating. Contradictory feedback on the same track can make it hard to know what to take away, especially when the comments are framed in technical terms. One important thing to keep in mind is that SubmitHub curators are individual tastemakers, not a unified review panel. Their reactions are often subjective, and sometimes that does lead to conflicting feedback. We try to be upfront about that on our side: many curators are hobbyists rather than professional consultants, so their feedback won’t always be consistent or useful for artistic development. On the listening side, we do track curator behavior and factor things like listen time and feedback quality into our internal quality systems. For premium submissions, curators are required to listen for at least 60 seconds and provide a meaningful response if they decline, and artists also have the option to choose longer listening instead of feedback. That said, your point is fair: timestamps and fragmented listening can feel at odds with how a producer evaluates arrangement and transitions. Feedback quality is something we actively monitor, and artists can also rate whether feedback was specific enough. That input helps shape curator quality over time. We appreciate you calling this out, and it's something we're definitely aware of and constantly acting on. SubmitHub works best as a way to test fit with different curators’ tastes, and we agree that consistency and quality control matter, so your review is useful feedback for us.
SubmitHub does exactly what they…
SubmitHub does exactly what they advertise. It gets you in front of the right curators all while being completely transparent throughout the entire process. The owner is always extremely responsive to any concerns and goes out of his way to make sure any issues are addressed.
The better friend to a composer !!!!!
The better friend to a composer ! ;) Submithub has different services. All are very helpful for a composer . Submit a track to real curators, make some Ads,etc..... I've tried too many others company. Honestly, with Submithub, i know why i spend my money. With others, i just spent my money . With Submithub, I invest in my music to promote it. It's the "difference" !!!! Thank you !
I'm satisfied thus far with SubmitHub
I'm satisfied thus far with SubmitHub. Great communication!
My opinion
I think it is relatively easy to use and set up. I have gotten some useful feedback from playlisters at times. Every curator has pretty clear requirements regarding genre and production. After a few trial runs, you learn who you’re compatible with. Submithub has helped me gain a following and some great contacts in the genre.
Jason and Tilly are the BEST amd they…
Jason and Tilly are the BEST amd they run the BEST artists resource page out there!
Has been central to getting exposure
Has been central to getting more exposure of my music
You can choose a music curator that…
You can choose a music curator that suits you and submit your music. Quality is maintained through feedback from the curators' evaluations.
submit hub is not all that legit.
submit hub is not all that legit. submit hub makes pretentious remarks and stands by them. Paying all this money for playlisters to send weird remarks about these songs the problem is.... its allowed. ITs just another website started to profit off of struggling musicians they don't appeal to mainstream record companies they got up. everytime you spend money artists should know they only have that power because they are cheap.
If you use the stats about the…
If you use the stats about the playlists it is actually quite easy to find your fit. also the ai functions actually work pretty ok.
Great experience!
I'm a new user and have had a great experience so far. Thanks for making things easy!
Playlist Push
Groover
SoundCampaign
YouGrow Promo
GPM Music Group
Boost Collective
Hypeddit
Musosoup